The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the T-Mobile Revvlry+ and the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G emerges as the winner thanks to its 5G connectivity, more modern chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G), and potentially better camera capabilities. While the Revvlry+ boasts faster charging, the A23 5G offers a more well-rounded and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 75.2 x 8.6 mm (6.24 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2270 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.24 inches, 97.5 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 509 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 12 MP, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 27W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 138h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
T-Mobile Revvlry+
- Faster 27W Charging
- Simple and Straightforward User Experience
- Potentially Lower Price (depending on deals)
- Older Chipset (Snapdragon 636)
- No 5G Connectivity
- Likely Less Capable Camera
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- More Modern and Efficient Chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Potentially Better Camera System
- Brighter Display
- Slower 25W Charging
- May be Slightly More Expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays with excellent contrast ratios (1328:1). The Galaxy A23 5G has a measured peak brightness of 508 nits, suggesting slightly better outdoor visibility. The Revvlry+ display is likely adequate but may not be as vibrant or bright. Resolution and panel type (likely LCD for both) are key factors to consider, with the A23 5G potentially having a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for the Revvlry+, but the Galaxy A23 5G is expected to offer a more versatile camera system. The A23 5G likely includes a main sensor with OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) and potentially ultrawide and macro lenses. Image processing capabilities are also likely superior on the A23 5G, resulting in better photos and videos in various conditions.
Performance
The Galaxy A23 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Revvlry+'s Snapdragon 636 (14nm). The 695 offers better efficiency and performance, especially when handling 5G connectivity and demanding apps. While both have octa-core CPUs, the A23 5G's architecture and newer manufacturing process give it a noticeable advantage in everyday use and gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings of 138 hours. This suggests excellent battery life for both devices, easily lasting a full day or more for most users. The Revvlry+ has a 27W wired charging advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups, while the A23 5G supports 25W charging.
Buying Guide
The T-Mobile Revvlry+ is a good choice for users heavily invested in the T-Mobile ecosystem who prioritize fast charging and a simple, straightforward experience. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is ideal for those seeking 5G connectivity, a slightly more powerful processor, and a potentially better camera system, all within a budget-friendly package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Revvlry+ support 5G?
No, the T-Mobile Revvlry+ does not support 5G connectivity. It relies on 4G LTE.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has significantly better gaming performance due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
