The smartphone landscape is constantly evolving, and choosing the right device can be overwhelming. Today, we're pitting a budget-friendly contender, the T-Mobile Revvlry, against a slightly older but powerful Sony Xperia X Performance. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges victorious.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sony Xperia X Performance is the clear winner. While the Revvlry offers affordability, the Xperia X Performance boasts a significantly faster processor, superior camera capabilities, and faster charging. It's a better overall package despite its age.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - F8131, F8132 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 38, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40, 41 - F8131, F8132 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2016, February 22. Released 2016, July 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 148.6 x 71.4 x 8.1 mm (5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 in) | 143.7 x 70.4 x 8.7 mm (5.66 x 2.77 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 164.4 g (5.78 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~441 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~76.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~68.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| | - | Triluminos display
X-Reality Engine |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Adreno 530 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM (SS), 64GB 3GB RAM (DS) |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 23 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.3", PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS/ BDS (region dependent) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, QC2 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | White, Graphite Black, Lime Gold, Rose Gold |
| Models | - | SO-04H, F8131, SOV33, F8132, 502SO |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -95.2dB / Crosstalk -95.1dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 61h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1461 (nominal), 3.234 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 63dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 67dB |
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 2179Basemark X: 28450 |
T-Mobile Revvlry
- Affordable
- Decent battery life (61h endurance rating)
- Compact size (likely)
- Weaker processor
- Basic camera
- Slow charging (10W)
- Limited availability of information
Sony Xperia X Performance
- Powerful Snapdragon 820 processor
- Excellent display with high contrast
- Good camera performance
- Fast charging (18W, QC2)
- Excellent battery life (61h endurance rating)
- Older device (potentially harder to find)
- May lack latest software updates
- Design may feel dated
Display Comparison
The Xperia X Performance features a superior display with excellent contrast ratios (1461 nominal, 3.234 in sunlight), making it easily viewable outdoors. The Revvlry's display is likely adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. Specific Revvlry display details are scarce, suggesting a more standard, budget-oriented panel.
Camera Comparison
The Xperia X Performance's camera is generally regarded as a strong point, offering good image quality and features. While specific Revvlry camera details are limited, it's unlikely to match the Xperia X Performance's capabilities in terms of image processing and low-light performance. Sony's camera software is also typically well-regarded.
Performance
Here, the Xperia X Performance shines. Its Snapdragon 820 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Revvlry's Snapdragon 632. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Xperia X Performance. The Revvlry will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 61 hours. This suggests excellent battery life for both devices, though real-world usage will vary. The Xperia X Performance's 18W charging is also significantly faster than the Revvlry's 10W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The T-Mobile Revvlry is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and don't need high-end performance. The Sony Xperia X Performance is suited for users who want a reliable, capable phone with a good camera and performance, even if it's a few years old and potentially harder to find.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Revvlry a good phone for gaming?
The Revvlry's Snapdragon 632 is not ideal for demanding games. You'll likely experience lag and reduced graphics settings. The Xperia X Performance offers a much better gaming experience.
❓ Where can I find a Sony Xperia X Performance?
As it's an older device, finding a new Xperia X Performance can be difficult. You'll likely need to look for it on used marketplaces like eBay or Swappa.
