T-Mobile Revvlry vs Samsung Galaxy S7: A Clash of Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
Despite the Revvlry's newer chipset, the Galaxy S7's superior display, camera, and significantly better performance (thanks to the Mongoose cores) make it the winner. The Revvlry offers value, but the S7 remains a compelling choice, especially considering its age and often lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile Revvlry | Samsung Galaxy S7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 - G930FD |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G930F, G930FD, G930W8 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 38, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G930F, G930FD |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G930W8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2016, February 21. Released 2016, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), glass back (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 148.6 x 71.4 x 8.1 mm (5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 in) | 142.4 x 69.6 x 7.9 mm (5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM (G930F)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G930FD) |
| Weight | - | 152 g (5.36 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~577 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~76.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.1 inches, 71.5 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Mongoose & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) | Exynos 8890 Octa (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-T880 MP12 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo), TouchWiz UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/1.7, 22mm (wide), 1/4.1", 1.34µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| - | ANT+ S-Voice natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired, QC2 Wireless (Qi) (market dependent) |
| Music play | - | Up to 62 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 22 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White, Gold, Silver, Pink Gold |
| Models | - | SM-G930F, SM-G930A, SM-G930P, SM-G930V, SM-G930T, SM-G930R, SM-G930F, SM-G930FD, SM-G930W8, SM-G930S, SM-G930L, SM-G930K, SM-G9300 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.40 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.5dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 80h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.376 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 69dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 71dB |
| Performance | - | Basemark OS II 2.0: 2128Basemark X: 32345 |
T-Mobile Revvlry
- Affordable
- Modern Design
- Decent for Basic Tasks
- Lower Performance
- Mediocre Camera
- No Wireless Charging
Samsung Galaxy S7
- Superior Display (AMOLED)
- Faster Performance (Mongoose Cores)
- Excellent Camera
- Long Battery Life
- Wireless Charging (Market Dependent)
- Older Device
- Potentially Limited Software Updates
Display Comparison
The Galaxy S7 boasts a significantly better display. While both have good sunlight readability (4.376 contrast ratio), the S7's AMOLED panel offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and a generally more vibrant viewing experience. The Revvlry likely uses an IPS LCD, which is adequate but lacks the punch of the S7's AMOLED.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S7's camera was a standout in its time and remains competitive. It offers excellent image quality, particularly in good lighting conditions. The Revvlry's camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots, but it won't match the S7's detail, dynamic range, or low-light performance. Video recording capabilities are also likely better on the S7.
Performance
The Galaxy S7's Exynos 8890 with its custom Mongoose cores provides noticeably faster performance than the Revvlry's Snapdragon 632. While the Revvlry's octa-core setup is decent for everyday tasks, the S7 handles demanding apps and multitasking with greater ease. Gaming performance will also be superior on the S7.
Battery Life
The Galaxy S7's endurance rating of 80h is exceptional, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Revvlry's battery capacity is likely larger, the S7's efficient chipset and optimized software contribute to its impressive longevity. The S7 also supports wireless charging (market dependent), a feature absent in the Revvlry.
Buying Guide
The T-Mobile Revvlry is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize a modern design and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is best for those who want a more premium experience with a better camera, display, and overall performance, and are comfortable with an older device.