Looking for an affordable smartphone that won't break the bank? The T-Mobile Revvlry and Nokia 3.2 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The T-Mobile Revvlry edges out the Nokia 3.2 thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 632 chipset, resulting in smoother performance. While both offer basic features, the Revvlry's processing power makes it the better overall choice for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 38, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 - EMEA, APAC, MENA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2019, February 24. Released 2019, May 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 148.6 x 71.4 x 8.1 mm (5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 in) | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm (6.28 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | Splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~76.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Adreno 504 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted, 32/3GB only), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Steel |
| Models | - | TA-1156, TA-1159, TA-1164 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.24 W/kg (head) 1.63 W/kg (body) |
T-Mobile Revvlry
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 632)
- More Responsive Performance
- Likely better color accuracy on display
- Generally more modern chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life than Nokia 3.2
- Basic camera features
- 10W charging is slow
Nokia 3.2
- Excellent Battery Life
- Clean Android Experience
- Depth Sensor for Portrait Mode
- Reliable and Simple
- Slower Processor (Snapdragon 429)
- Laggy Performance
- Basic Display Quality
- Slow Charging
Display Comparison
Both phones feature HD+ displays, but the Revvlry likely has slightly better color accuracy due to its more modern chipset. The Nokia 3.2's display is adequate for everyday use, but don't expect vibrant colors or high brightness. Screen sizes are similar, around 6.2-6.3 inches.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia 3.2 boasts a 13MP main camera with a depth sensor, potentially offering slightly better portrait mode capabilities. The Revvlry likely has a similar resolution camera, but the image processing will be impacted by the less powerful chipset. Both phones offer basic camera functionality, but don't expect flagship-level image quality.
Performance
This is where the Revvlry shines. The Snapdragon 632 is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 429. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Revvlry. The Nokia 3.2 will feel sluggish at times, especially with multiple apps open.
Battery Life
The Nokia 3.2 is known for its excellent battery life, often lasting a full day or more on a single charge. The Revvlry's battery life is likely comparable, but the less efficient chipset might result in slightly shorter usage times. Both phones support 10W charging, which is relatively slow.
Buying Guide
The T-Mobile Revvlry is ideal for users who prioritize performance and responsiveness, even on a budget. The Nokia 3.2 is a good option for those seeking a simple, reliable phone with a clean Android experience and a focus on battery life, and who are less concerned with speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Nokia is generally known for providing timely Android updates and security patches, so the Nokia 3.2 likely has an edge in software support.
❓ Can I play games on either of these phones?
The T-Mobile Revvlry is better suited for light gaming due to its more powerful processor. The Nokia 3.2 can handle basic games, but performance will be limited.
