T-Mobile Revvlry vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Clash of Budget Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. While the Revvlry offers affordability, the Pixel 7a’s superior camera, faster processor, brighter display, and longer software support make it a significantly better overall package, justifying its slightly higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile Revvlry | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 38, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 148.6 x 71.4 x 8.1 mm (5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 81.1 cm2 (~76.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
T-Mobile Revvlry
- Affordable
- Decent for basic tasks
- T-Mobile optimized
- Slow performance
- Mediocre camera
- Limited software updates
- Slow charging
- Dim display
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera
- Fast performance
- Bright and vibrant display
- Long software support
- Wireless charging
- Fast charging
- Slightly more expensive
- Tensor G2 can get warm under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display (1070 nits) compared to the Revvlry, offering better visibility outdoors and a more vibrant viewing experience. While the Revvlry's display is adequate, it lacks the punch and clarity of the Pixel 7a's OLED panel. Expect better color accuracy and contrast on the Pixel 7a.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a's camera is a major selling point. Google's computational photography is renowned, delivering exceptional image quality, especially in low light. The Revvlry's camera is serviceable, but lacks the detail, dynamic range, and overall image processing capabilities of the Pixel 7a. Video recording is also significantly better on the Pixel 7a.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a's Google Tensor G2 chipset is a powerhouse compared to the Revvlry's Snapdragon 632. The Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 core delivers noticeably faster performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Revvlry will handle everyday tasks, but will struggle with more intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving an endurance rating of 76 hours. While the Revvlry's battery capacity is likely similar, the Pixel 7a's efficient processor and software optimization contribute to its longer lifespan. The Pixel 7a also supports faster charging (18W wired, 7.5W wireless) compared to the Revvlry's 10W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The T-Mobile Revvlry is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and don't need advanced features. The Google Pixel 7a is perfect for those who want a premium experience, excellent camera quality, and timely software updates without spending flagship money.