T-Mobile Revvl vs. Motorola Moto G7: A Budget Showdown

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the T-Mobile Revvl and the Motorola Moto G7. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Motorola Moto G7 takes the crown. Its superior chipset, longer battery life, and generally better performance make it the more compelling choice despite similar display quality. The Revvl's value proposition is lessened by its older processor.

PHONES
Phone Names	T-Mobile Revvl	Motorola Moto G7

Network
2G bands	GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 1700 (AWS)/ 1900	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe
4G bands	2, 4, 5, 12, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe
Speed	HSPA, LTE	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE
	-	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 66, 38, 40, 41 - USA

Launch
Announced	2017, August. Released 2017, August	2019, February. Released 2019, March
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame
Dimensions	151.9 x 77 x 8.4 mm (5.98 x 3.03 x 0.33 in)	157 x 75.3 x 8 mm (6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	157.9 g (5.64 oz)	172 g (6.07 oz)
	-	Water-repellent coating

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution	720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)	1080 x 2270 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~405 ppi density)
Size	5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio)	6.2 inches, 96.2 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	IPS LCD

Platform
CPU	Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53	Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver)
Chipset	Mediatek MT6738	Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm)
GPU	Mali-T860MP2	Adreno 506
OS	Android 7.0 (Nougat)	Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (dedicated slot)	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	32GB 2GB RAM	64GB 4GB RAM
	-	eMMC 5.1

Main Camera
Dual	-	12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens
Features	LED flash, HDR	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Single	13 MP, AF	-
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	LED flash	HDR
Single	5 MP	8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Video	-	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	4.2, A2DP	4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX
NFC	No	Yes (Europe model)
Positioning	GPS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
Radio	FM radio	FM radio
USB	microUSB 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass (market dependent)

Battery
Charging	-	15W wired
Stand-by	Up to 288 h (3G)	-
Talk time	Up to 12 h (3G)	-
Type	Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable	Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable

Misc
Colors	Black	Ceramic Black, Clear White
Models	-	XT1962, XT1962-4
Price	About 110 EUR	About 190 EUR
SAR	-	1.13 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.45 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body)

Tests
Audio quality	-	Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -94.8dB
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 66h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1565:1 (nominal), 3.011 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker	-	Voice 70dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 84dB
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 106292 (v7) GeekBench: 4755 (v4.4) GFXBench: 3.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

T-Mobile Revvl

Affordable
Decent display
Compact size

Outdated chipset
Shorter battery life
Potentially lower build quality
Limited software updates

Motorola Moto G7

Better performance
Longer battery life
More modern chipset
Generally better build quality
More frequent software updates

May be slightly more expensive
Camera could be better in low light

Display Comparison

Both phones feature a 6.2-inch display, likely with an HD+ resolution. While the contrast ratios are similar (1565:1 nominal, 3.011 in sunlight), the Moto G7's display is generally considered slightly better due to potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The Revvl's display is adequate but may lack the vibrancy of the Moto G7.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is generally comparable, but the Moto G7 likely has a slight edge due to its more modern image processing capabilities. Both phones offer decent photo and video quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance may be lacking on both. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more precise comparison.

Performance

This is where the Moto G7 shines. Its Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 chipset with an octa-core processor significantly outperforms the Revvl's Mediatek MT6738 and quad-core CPU. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the Moto G7. The Revvl will likely struggle with more demanding apps and games.

Battery Life

The Moto G7 boasts a significantly better battery life, with an endurance rating of 66 hours. The Revvl's battery life is likely shorter, though exact figures are difficult to find. This difference in battery performance is a major advantage for the Moto G7.

Buying Guide

The T-Mobile Revvl might be a decent option for users on a *very* tight budget who prioritize affordability above all else and are light users. The Motorola Moto G7 is ideal for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded smartphone with good battery life and performance for everyday tasks and occasional photography.