T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G vs. Google Pixel 5a 5G: Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 5a 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset and Google's computational photography deliver consistently better images, while its 861 nits display provides a brighter viewing experience. However, the REVVL V+ 5G offers a competitive package for those focused on raw value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 01. Released 2021, July 12 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 173.7 x 77.5 x 7.1 mm (6.84 x 3.05 x 0.28 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, (wide), AF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black | Mostly Black |
| Models | - | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent 5G connectivity
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Inferior camera performance
- Less refined software experience
- Display brightness and quality are likely lower
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Optimized software and long-term support
- Slightly higher price
- Charging speed is similar to the REVVL V+ 5G despite PD2.0
- May not be available through all carriers
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 861 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the REVVL V+ 5G. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Pixel 5a’s infinite contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vivid colors. The REVVL V+ 5G’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and viewing angles unanswered. The Pixel 5a’s superior brightness is a clear advantage for media consumption and everyday use.
Camera Comparison
The Google Pixel 5a 5G’s camera prowess is largely attributed to Google’s exceptional image processing algorithms, even with a likely similar main sensor size to the REVVL V+ 5G. While specific sensor details are missing for the REVVL V+ 5G, the Pixel 5a’s computational photography excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image clarity. The REVVL V+ 5G’s camera system is likely more reliant on hardware, potentially resulting in less refined images. The absence of detailed camera specs for the REVVL V+ 5G suggests it doesn’t offer the same level of photographic sophistication as the Pixel 5a.
Performance
Both phones employ 7nm process nodes, but the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G in the Pixel 5a 5G features a more sophisticated CPU architecture. Its Kryo 475 Prime core, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offers a performance edge over the REVVL V+ 5G’s Dimensity 700, which relies on a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup peaking at 2.2 GHz. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon’s tri-cluster design (Prime, Gold, Silver) allows for more efficient task allocation. This difference will be noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking scenarios, favoring the Pixel 5a 5G. Both devices likely share 6GB of RAM, but the Pixel 5a benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized memory controller.
Battery Life
Both the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G and Google Pixel 5a 5G share an endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. Both support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 5a 5G adds PD2.0 support, potentially enabling faster charging with compatible chargers. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Pixel 5a’s optimized power management, stemming from the Snapdragon 765G chipset and Google’s software, likely contributes to its efficient battery performance. The inclusion of PD2.0 gives the Pixel 5a a slight edge in charging convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G if you need a functional 5G phone with decent performance for basic tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prefer a superior camera experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and the benefits of Google’s software and long-term support, even if it means spending slightly more.