The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A51. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A51 offers a more polished experience with a brighter display, better camera, and longer software support. While the REVVL V+ 5G boasts 5G connectivity and a newer chipset, the A51's overall refinement and established brand make it the stronger choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A515U |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 01 | 2019, December 12. Released 2019, December 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 12 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173.7 x 77.5 x 7.1 mm (6.84 x 3.05 x 0.28 in) | 158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm (6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, (wide), AF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing
ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink |
| Models | - | SM-A515F, SM-A515F/DSN, SM-A515F/DS, SM-A515F/DST, SM-A515F/DSM, SM-A515F/N, SM-A515U, SM-A515U1, SM-A515W, SM-A515X, SM-S515DL |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 299.99 |
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 674.99 |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 211.50 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 179.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.1dB / Crosstalk -87.3dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 86h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 113051 (v7), 175363 (v8)
GeekBench: 5401 (v4.4), 1294 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Newer Chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Potentially better efficiency
- Less Bright Display
- Likely Inferior Camera
- Limited Software Support
- Less Known Brand
Samsung Galaxy A51
- Brighter Display
- Superior Camera
- Excellent Battery Life
- Established Brand & Software Support
- Better Value (depending on configuration)
- Older Chipset (Exynos 9611)
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Price can vary significantly based on configuration
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A51 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight. While the REVVL V+ 5G's display is adequate, it lacks the A51's vibrancy and brightness. The A51's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent black levels, further enhancing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A51 consistently receives praise for its camera capabilities, offering versatile shooting options and generally better image quality. While the REVVL V+ 5G's camera is functional, it likely won't match the A51's detail and dynamic range. Specific camera specs for the REVVL V+ 5G are less readily available, further suggesting a disadvantage.
Performance
The REVVL V+ 5G's Dimensity 700 chipset (7nm) is newer than the Galaxy A51's Exynos 9611 (10nm), potentially offering slightly better efficiency. However, the A51's CPU configuration (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73) provides strong performance for everyday tasks. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization and RAM configuration.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A51 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 86 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. The REVVL V+ 5G's battery capacity is likely smaller, and while 18W charging is decent, it's slower than the A51's 15W charging. The A51's superior battery optimization contributes to its longevity.
Buying Guide
The T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a slightly more modern chipset on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a better fit for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded smartphone with a superior display, camera, and longer software update commitment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the REVVL V+ 5G have good software support?
T-Mobile REVVL phones are known for limited software updates. Don't expect long-term Android version upgrades.
❓ Is the Galaxy A51 still worth buying in [current year]?
Yes, the Galaxy A51 remains a solid choice due to its reliable performance, excellent battery life, and good camera. It's a great value option, especially if you can find it at a discounted price.
