Google Pixel 6a vs. T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chipset provides significantly better performance and future-proofing, coupled with a superior camera experience. While the REVVL V+ 5G offers a lower entry price, the Pixel 6a’s overall refinement and capabilities justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 01 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 12 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.7 x 77.5 x 7.1 mm (6.84 x 3.05 x 0.28 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, (wide), AF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G
- Superior performance with Google Tensor chip
- Excellent camera quality and image processing
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Higher price point than the REVVL V+ 5G
- Charging speed is relatively slow compared to some competitors
Google Pixel 6a
- Significantly lower price
- 5G connectivity
- Functional and reliable for basic tasks
- Inferior performance compared to the Pixel 6a
- Less capable camera system
- Limited software update support
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 876 nits, compared to the REVVL V+ 5G’s unspecified brightness. This difference translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize OLED technology (implied by the Pixel 6a’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio), the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and Google’s color calibration offer a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The REVVL V+ 5G’s display specs are minimal, suggesting a focus on cost reduction rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a clear advantage. While specific sensor details are missing for the REVVL V+ 5G, the Pixel 6a leverages Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms powered by the Tensor chip. This results in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pixel 6a’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The REVVL V+ 5G likely relies on more basic image processing, resulting in less refined photos. Ignoring the likely inclusion of a low-resolution macro lens on the REVVL V+ 5G, the Pixel 6a’s overall camera experience is significantly more capable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.80 GHz, provides a significant performance boost in demanding tasks. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management. While the Dimensity 700 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Tensor offers a smoother experience with multitasking, gaming, and AI-powered features. The Pixel 6a’s likely use of faster LPDDR5 RAM further enhances performance.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified for the REVVL V+ 5G). However, the Pixel 6a benefits from the more efficient Google Tensor chip and potentially optimized software. Both support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 6a also supports PD3.0, offering potentially faster and more efficient charging with compatible chargers. The similar endurance ratings suggest that real-world usage will be comparable, but the Pixel 6a’s charging standard provides added flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL V+ 5G if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic 5G connectivity without demanding high performance or advanced camera features. It’s ideal for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a smooth user experience, excellent camera quality, and the promise of timely software updates, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.