Google Pixel 7a vs. T-Mobile REVVL 6x Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and unlocks advanced features like Google’s AI-powered camera capabilities. While the REVVL 6x Pro offers a compelling value, the Pixel 7a’s overall experience justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile REVVL 6x Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 17 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 24 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.9 x 77.8 x 9 mm (6.85 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 223.3 g (7.87 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12 or 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Blue | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
T-Mobile REVVL 6x Pro
- Superior performance with the Google Tensor G2
- Exceptional camera quality with Google’s AI processing
- Faster charging with 18W PD3.0 and wireless charging
- Higher price point than the REVVL 6x Pro
- May not offer expandable storage
Google Pixel 7a
- Significantly lower price
- Functional and reliable for basic tasks
- Potentially longer battery life in light usage
- Substantially slower performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited charging speed and no wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an assumed lower brightness on the REVVL 6x Pro (typical of its price bracket). This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Pixel 7a’s superior brightness and potentially wider color gamut offer a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The REVVL 6x Pro’s display specs are not provided, suggesting a focus on cost reduction rather than display quality.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The REVVL 6x Pro’s camera is likely more reliant on hardware, and without details on sensor size or aperture, it’s reasonable to assume it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities will also be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the T-Mobile REVVL 6x Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor G2’s octa-core configuration, featuring Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz, provides a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and AI processing. The Dimensity 700, while capable for everyday use, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting efficient power management despite its powerful processor. The REVVL 6x Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its less demanding chipset and 15W charging may result in comparable, or slightly longer, battery life in light usage scenarios. However, the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging with PD3.0 support offers faster charging speeds and greater compatibility with modern chargers, while the REVVL 6x Pro is limited to 15W wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL 6x Pro if you prioritize absolute affordability and need a basic, functional smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value camera quality, smooth performance, and access to Google’s latest software features, even if it means spending more upfront.