T-Mobile REVVL 6 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: Which Budget 5G Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the T-Mobile REVVL 6 emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, featuring a higher clocked Cortex-A76 core, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Galaxy A32 5G’s Dimensity 720, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and light gaming. Both phones offer identical battery endurance and charging speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile REVVL 6 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat16 1024/75 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - SM-A326U | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 28 | 2021, January 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 28 | Available. Released 2021, January 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.6 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.56 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD, 60Hz (International), 90Hz (SM-A326U, SM-326DL only) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Models | TMAF025G | SM-A326B, SM-A326B/DS, SM-A326BR/DS, SM-A326BR, SM-A326U, SM-A326W, SM-A326U1, SM-A326K, SCG08, SM-S326DL |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 111.89 / $ 78.64 / £ 77.53 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.33 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1470:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 226561 (v8) GeekBench: 1673 (v5.1) |
T-Mobile REVVL 6
- Slightly faster processor for smoother performance
- Competitive 5G connectivity
- Identical battery life to the A32 5G
- Display brightness potentially lower than A32 5G
- Limited brand recognition compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Samsung’s established software ecosystem
- Competitive 5G connectivity
- Slightly slower processor impacting responsiveness
- Potentially less efficient CPU
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 497 nits, slightly exceeding the REVVL 6’s unmeasured value, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays share a similar contrast ratio around 1470:1 to 1490:1, indicating comparable black levels and color depth. However, without knowing the panel technology used in the REVVL 6, it’s difficult to assess potential differences in color accuracy or viewing angles. The A32 5G’s brightness advantage is likely more noticeable in outdoor scenarios.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both utilize standard smartphone camera setups, and the image processing algorithms will likely be the defining factor. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A32 5G is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. Focusing on the main sensor’s capabilities would be more relevant, but data is unavailable.
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek’s Dimensity series, but the REVVL 6’s Dimensity 700 features a key advantage: a 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 CPU core compared to the A32 5G’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76. This higher clock speed translates to faster single-core performance, impacting app launch times and overall system responsiveness. While both chipsets are 7nm, the REVVL 6’s CPU configuration provides a tangible performance boost. Both phones share 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, meaning multi-core performance will be similar. The impact of RAM speed (LPDDR4X is likely on both) is minimal in this price bracket.
Battery Life
Both the T-Mobile REVVL 6 and the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating virtually identical battery life under similar usage conditions. Both devices also support 15W wired charging, meaning 0-100% charge times will be comparable, likely taking around 2-2.5 hours. The identical endurance ratings suggest that despite potential differences in battery capacity (unspecified), power efficiency is similar between the two devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL 6 if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive user experience and anticipate running multiple apps or playing moderately demanding games. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G if you value Samsung’s established software ecosystem and slightly brighter display, and your usage is primarily focused on basic communication and media consumption.