Google Pixel 6a vs. T-Mobile REVVL 6: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chip provides a significantly more responsive and capable experience, coupled with a vastly improved camera system. While the REVVL 6 offers a compelling value proposition, the Pixel 6a’s performance and software support justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile REVVL 6 | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 28 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 28 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.6 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.56 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | TMAF025G | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
T-Mobile REVVL 6
- Significantly faster performance with Google Tensor chip
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Higher price point than the REVVL 6
- Charging speed is not class-leading
Google Pixel 6a
- Extremely affordable price
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Functional and reliable for everyday tasks
- Limited performance for demanding applications
- Inferior camera quality compared to the Pixel 6a
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 876 nits, compared to the REVVL 6’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both phones likely utilize OLED panels (based on the Pixel 6a’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio), the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and Google’s display calibration offer a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The REVVL 6’s display specs are minimal, suggesting a focus on cost reduction rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a clear winner. While specific sensor details are missing for the REVVL 6, the Pixel 6a benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms powered by the Tensor chip. This results in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pixel 6a’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The REVVL 6 likely relies on more basic image processing, resulting in less refined photos. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on the REVVL 6, the Pixel 6a’s software advantage is the defining factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the T-Mobile REVVL 6’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.80 GHz, provides a significant performance boost over the REVVL 6’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management. This means the Pixel 6a will handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing with greater ease and less throttling. The REVVL 6 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with more intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing internal capacities. However, the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging with PD3.0 support offers faster and more efficient charging compared to the REVVL 6’s 15W wired charging. While neither phone offers exceptionally fast charging, the Pixel 6a’s PD3.0 compatibility ensures broader charger compatibility and potentially quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL 6 if you prioritize absolute affordability and need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a smooth user experience, excellent camera quality, and guaranteed software updates, even if it means spending a bit more.