T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and a refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro provides a surprisingly capable 5G experience at a significantly lower cost, making it ideal for budget-conscious consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 28 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 28 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.9 x 77.8 x 9 mm (6.85 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Wireless | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Shadow | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | TMAF035G | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro
- Significantly lower price point
- 5G connectivity for budget users
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Inferior display quality (likely lower brightness and LCD panel)
- Less powerful processor compared to the A53
- Slower charging speed (15W)
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant Super AMOLED display
- More powerful Exynos 1280 processor
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Higher price tag
- Software updates may be slower than some competitors
- Bloatware potential with Samsung's One UI
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a clear advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 830 nits. This significantly surpasses what we’d expect from the REVVL 6 Pro, making the A53 far more usable outdoors. While the REVVL 6 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, T-Mobile typically focuses on cost reduction, suggesting a lower peak brightness. The A53’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a Super AMOLED panel, offering superior blacks and color vibrancy compared to the likely LCD panel on the REVVL 6 Pro. This difference is crucial for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Samsung typically invests heavily in camera technology. The A53 likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The REVVL 6 Pro, focusing on affordability, likely utilizes a more basic camera setup. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A53 is largely a marketing feature and offers limited practical benefit, but the overall system is still expected to outperform the REVVL 6 Pro’s camera.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is powered by the Exynos 1280 (5nm), featuring a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores – compared to the T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The A78 cores in the Exynos 1280 offer a performance uplift over the A76 cores in the Dimensity 700, translating to snappier app loading and smoother multitasking. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also contributes to improved power efficiency. While both phones utilize a 6x Cortex-A55 cluster for efficiency, the A53’s overall processing power is demonstrably higher. The REVVL 6 Pro will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the A53 will provide a more responsive experience, especially with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The A53 5G supports 25W wired charging, allowing for a faster 0-100% charge compared to the REVVL 6 Pro’s slower 15W charging. While both phones offer comparable battery endurance, the A53’s faster charging is a convenience advantage, reducing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro if you need a functional 5G smartphone without breaking the bank and are willing to compromise on display brightness and camera sophistication. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prioritize a vibrant, bright display, a more versatile camera system, and Samsung’s software features and long-term support.