Google Pixel 6a vs. T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chip delivers significantly faster performance and superior image processing, justifying the price difference. While the REVVL 6 Pro offers a decent experience, it can't match the Pixel 6a's overall polish and capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 28 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 28 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.9 x 77.8 x 9 mm (6.85 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Wireless | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Shadow | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | TMAF035G | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro
- Significantly faster performance with Google Tensor
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Faster charging with PD3.0 support
- Higher price point
- May not be available directly from all carriers
Google Pixel 6a
- More affordable price
- Available directly from T-Mobile
- Decent battery life
- Slower performance with Dimensity 700
- Inferior camera quality
- Slower charging speed
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 876 nits, compared to the REVVL 6 Pro’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both phones likely utilize OLED panels (based on the Pixel 6a’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio), the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and Google’s color calibration provide a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The REVVL 6 Pro’s display specs are minimal, suggesting a more basic panel.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs are limited for the REVVL 6 Pro, the Pixel 6a’s image processing prowess, powered by the Tensor chip, is a clear advantage. The Pixel 6a excels in computational photography, delivering exceptional dynamic range and detail, particularly in low-light conditions. The REVVL 6 Pro likely relies on more basic image processing algorithms. The Pixel 6a’s software features, like Magic Eraser, further enhance its camera capabilities. Without knowing the REVVL 6 Pro’s sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Pixel 6a’s software advantage is significant.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.80 GHz, provides a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The 5nm manufacturing process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The REVVL 6 Pro’s Dimensity 700, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The Tensor’s integrated machine learning capabilities also enhance features like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the Pixel 6a’s more powerful processor. However, the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging with PD3.0 support offers faster and more efficient charging compared to the REVVL 6 Pro’s 15W wired charging. While neither phone offers blazing-fast charging, the Pixel 6a’s faster charging speed can be a convenience for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL 6 Pro if you prioritize affordability above all else and need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value performance, camera quality, and software updates, and are willing to spend a bit more for a premium experience. The Pixel 6a is ideal for photography enthusiasts and users who demand a smooth, responsive user interface.