The T-Mobile REVVL 4 and Xiaomi Redmi 10C represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The REVVL 4, often available at extremely competitive prices, relies on MediaTek's Helio A22. The Redmi 10C, while slightly more expensive, boasts Qualcomm's Snapdragon 680, promising a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi 10C is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 680 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides significantly better performance and responsiveness than the REVVL 4’s Helio A22. While the REVVL 4 may be cheaper, the Redmi 10C’s improved user experience justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 27. Released 2020, September 04 | 2022, March 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159 x 76 x 8.1 mm (6.26 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 158.5 (5.61 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, PDAF | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green |
| Models | 5007Z, 5007W, TMRVL4G | 220333QAG, 220333QBI, 220333QNY, 220333QL |
| Price | About 100 EUR | £ 99.00 / € 109.86 |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
T-Mobile REVVL 4
- Potentially the lowest possible price point.
- Simple and straightforward Android experience.
- Acceptable for basic communication tasks.
- Significantly underpowered processor.
- Poor performance for multitasking or gaming.
- Likely limited software update support.
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
- Much faster and more efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset.
- 18W fast charging support.
- Improved camera performance due to ISP.
- Better long-term software support (likely).
- Slightly higher price than the REVVL 4.
- Still a budget device with inherent limitations.
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to deliver a premium display experience. Specifics regarding panel type (IPS vs. TFT) and resolution are not provided, but both likely target a 720p+ resolution. The key difference lies in the underlying processing power needed to drive the display; the Snapdragon 680 will handle UI animations and scrolling more fluidly. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong suit for either.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi 10C benefits from the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 680, which generally offers superior image processing capabilities compared to the ISP found in the Helio A22. While both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially depth/macro sensors, the Redmi 10C’s ISP will likely produce more detailed and dynamic range-rich photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The REVVL 4 will likely struggle with image quality in low light.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi 10C’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680, fabricated on a 6nm process, is a clear winner. Its octa-core configuration (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) offers significantly more processing power than the T-Mobile REVVL 4’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU based on the older 12nm MediaTek Helio A22. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable overall user experience. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use. Gamers will find the Redmi 10C far more capable, even if limited to less demanding titles.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for the REVVL 4, but typical budget phones in this class hover around 4000-5000mAh. The Redmi 10C’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage. While not exceptionally fast by modern standards, it’s considerably quicker than the charging speeds typically found on phones in the REVVL 4’s price bracket. The Snapdragon 680’s 6nm efficiency also contributes to better battery life, meaning the Redmi 10C will likely last longer on a single charge despite potentially having a similar capacity battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the T-Mobile REVVL 4 if you absolutely need the lowest possible upfront cost and your smartphone usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10C if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and appreciate the benefit of faster charging and a more modern chipset architecture.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi 10C handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Redmi 10C’s Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to play at lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Helio A22 in the REVVL 4 would struggle significantly with these titles, offering a poor gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Redmi 10C compared to the REVVL 4?
The REVVL 4 likely supports standard 5W or 10W charging. The Redmi 10C’s 18W charging will reduce charging times considerably. Expect a full charge on the Redmi 10C to take around 2-3 hours, while the REVVL 4 could take 5+ hours.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is very noticeable. The Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi 10C will result in smoother scrolling, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience when browsing the web or using social media apps. The REVVL 4 will feel sluggish in comparison.
