Sony Xperia XZs vs Xperia XZ3: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ3 is the clear winner. While the XZs boasts a respectable endurance rating, the XZ3’s Snapdragon 845, improved display, wireless charging, and slightly better battery life make it a more modern and compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZs | Sony Xperia XZ3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (G8232) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G8231, G8232 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - H8416, H9436, H9493 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G8231, G8232 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - H8416, H9436, H9493 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat9 450/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2017, February 27. Released 2017, April 03 | 2018, August 30. Released 2018, October 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 146 x 72 x 8.1 mm (5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) | 158 x 73 x 9.9 mm (6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM (G8231)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G8232) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~537 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, HDR BT.2020 |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 7.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", predictive PDAF | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (5-axis gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (5-axis gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted, region dependent), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless (Qi) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2900 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Warm Silver, Ice Blue | Black, Silver White, Forest Green, Bordeaux Red |
| Models | G8232, G8231, SOV35, 602SO, SO-03J | H9436, H8416, H9493 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 510 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | Noise -91.2dB / Crosstalk -88.7dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 73h | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1223:1 (nominal), 3.818 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.502 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 62dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 73dB | Voice 71dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 170766 (v8) GeekBench: 808 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 284555 (v7), 295468 (v8) GeekBench: 8607 (v4.4), 2137 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XZs
- Compact design
- Good camera for its time
- Decent battery life (73h)
- QC3 charging
- Older chipset
- LCD display
- No wireless charging
- Less vibrant colors
Sony Xperia XZ3
- Faster Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Vibrant OLED display
- Wireless charging (Qi)
- Improved performance
- Larger 6-inch display
- Larger size compared to XZs
- Can be pricier (depending on availability)
Display Comparison
The XZ3’s display is a significant upgrade. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (effectively OLED) provides deeper blacks and more vibrant colors compared to the XZs’ LCD. The XZ3 also boasts a higher sunlight readability score (4.502 vs 3.818), making it easier to see outdoors. The XZ3 also features a 6-inch display versus the XZs' 5.2-inch, offering more screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer excellent camera performance for their time. However, the XZ3 benefits from Sony's continued camera improvements, including better image processing and low-light performance. While both have Photo/Video capabilities, the XZ3's software enhancements give it a slight edge.
Performance
The XZ3’s Snapdragon 845 chipset is noticeably faster and more efficient than the XZs’ Snapdragon 820. This translates to smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and better gaming performance. The XZ3's octa-core CPU also provides a performance advantage over the XZs' quad-core processor.
Battery Life
The XZ3 maintains a similar endurance rating (90h) to the XZs (73h), but the more efficient Snapdragon 845 means it likely delivers longer real-world usage. The addition of wireless charging on the XZ3 is also a convenient feature missing on the XZs.
Buying Guide
The Xperia XZs is a good option for budget-conscious users who prioritize a compact design and a capable camera, and don't need the latest features. The Xperia XZ3 is ideal for those seeking a faster processor, a brighter and more vibrant display, wireless charging, and a more modern overall experience.