Sony Xperia XZs vs Xperia XZ1 Compact: The Ultimate Compact Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ1 Compact edges out the XZs thanks to its more powerful Snapdragon 835 chipset, improved battery life, and slightly more modern design. While the XZs boasts a fantastic display, the XZ1 Compact's overall performance and longevity make it the winner.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZs | Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (G8232) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G8231, G8232 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G8231, G8232 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat9 450/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2017, February 27. Released 2017, April 03 | 2017, August. Released 2017, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 146 x 72 x 8.1 mm (5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) | 129 x 65 x 9.3 mm (5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM (G8231)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G8232) | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 140 g (4.94 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~319 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.6 inches, 58.3 cm2 (~69.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Adreno 540 |
| OS | Android 7.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", predictive PDAF | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.4, 18mm, 1/4.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted, region dependent), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 2900 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Warm Silver, Ice Blue | Black, White Silver, Horizon Blue, Twilight Pink |
| Models | G8232, G8231, SOV35, 602SO, SO-03J | G8441, SO-02K |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -85.5dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 73h | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1223:1 (nominal), 3.818 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1243:1 (nominal), 3.729 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 62dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 73dB | Voice 65dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 76dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 170766 (v8) GeekBench: 808 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 204581 (v7), 255140 (v8) GeekBench: 5596 (v4.4), 1681 (v5.1) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XZs
- Excellent display
- Compact size
- Good camera
- QC3 fast charging
- Older chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Design feels dated
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
- More powerful processor
- Longer battery life
- Improved camera performance
- Slightly more modern design
- Smaller screen than some competitors
- Can still feel a bit dated
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays with impressive contrast ratios (1223:1 nominal, 3.818 and 3.729 sunlight respectively). The XZ1 Compact's display is marginally brighter in sunlight, offering slightly better visibility outdoors. Color accuracy is generally good on both devices, typical of Sony's displays.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the XZ1 Compact benefits from Sony's image processing improvements. While both capture good photos in well-lit conditions, the XZ1 Compact generally produces more detailed and vibrant images. Low-light performance is also slightly better on the XZ1 Compact. Both offer 4K video recording.
Performance
The XZ1 Compact's Snapdragon 835 chipset is a significant upgrade over the XZs' Snapdragon 820. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better overall responsiveness. The XZ1 Compact's octa-core processor also handles demanding games and applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
The XZ1 Compact shines in battery life, offering a significantly longer endurance rating (108h) compared to the XZs (73h). This means you can expect to get through a full day of moderate to heavy use on the XZ1 Compact without needing to recharge, while the XZs may require a top-up.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XZs is a good choice for users prioritizing a vibrant display and a familiar design. It's ideal for those who don't need the absolute latest processing power. The Xperia XZ1 Compact is best suited for users who value battery life, performance, and a more compact form factor without sacrificing features. It's a great option for those who want a flagship experience in a smaller package.