Sony Xperia XZ2 vs. XZ2 Compact: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The XZ2 delivers a larger display and potentially better audio, while the XZ2 Compact shines with its portability and slightly improved sunlight visibility. Both offer excellent performance and battery life. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priority: screen real estate or pocket-friendliness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, February 26. Released 2018, April 20 | 2018, February. Released 2018, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 153 x 72 x 11.1 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 in) | 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm (5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~483 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0" | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3180 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2870 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Liquid Black, Liquid Silver, Deep Green, Ash Pink | Black, White Silver, Moss Green, Coral Pink |
| Models | H8266, H8216, H8296, H8276, 702SO, SOV37 | H8324, H8314, SO-05K |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -89.2dB | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1434 (nominal), 3.58 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1315:1 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 78dB | Voice 66dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 83dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 259244 (v7), 281749 (v8) GeekBench: 8466 (v4.4), 2060 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 265326 (v7), 308651 (v8) GeekBench: 8487 (v4.4), 2174 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XZ2
- Larger Display
- Potentially better audio
- Premium Build Quality
- Powerful Snapdragon 845
- Larger Size/Less Pocketable
- Sunlight Readability slightly lower than Compact
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
- Compact and Pocketable
- Slightly better sunlight readability
- Fast Charging (QC3)
- Powerful Snapdragon 845
- Smaller Display
- Potentially less immersive audio
- May feel cramped for some users
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The XZ2 has a 6.0-inch display with a 1434:1 contrast ratio (nominal) and 3.58 sunlight readability. The XZ2 Compact has a 5.0-inch display with a slightly better 1315:1 contrast ratio (nominal) and 3.765 sunlight readability, making it marginally easier to view outdoors. The XZ2's larger size provides more screen real estate for multitasking and media.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature excellent camera systems capable of capturing high-quality photos and videos. While specific camera specs are not detailed, both utilize Sony's image processing technology. The XZ2's larger sensor *may* offer a slight advantage in low-light conditions, but both are capable of producing impressive results.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 chipset and Octa-core CPU, ensuring smooth and responsive performance for demanding tasks and games. You shouldn't notice a significant difference in everyday usage or gaming performance between the two.
Battery Life
Remarkably, both the XZ2 and XZ2 Compact share the same impressive endurance rating of 88 hours. This suggests excellent battery optimization despite the size difference. The XZ2 Compact's smaller size *might* translate to slightly better efficiency in certain scenarios, but the difference is likely negligible.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is ideal for users who prioritize a larger screen for media consumption and gaming, and appreciate a more immersive audio experience. The XZ2 Compact is perfect for those seeking a powerful yet compact phone that's easy to handle and carry, without sacrificing performance.