Sony Xperia XZ2 vs Xperia XZ: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ2 edges out the XZ thanks to its significantly better battery life and more powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset. While the XZ offers QC3 charging, the XZ2's overall performance and endurance make it the stronger contender, especially for users prioritizing longevity and speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Sony Xperia XZ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - F8331, F8332 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - F8331, F8332 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, February 26. Released 2018, April 20 | 2016, September 01. Released 2016, October 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 153 x 72 x 11.1 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 in) | 146 x 72 x 8.1 mm (5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 | IPS LCD |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 530 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF | 23 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.3", PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0" | 13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS/ BDS (region dependent) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 600 h (2G) / Up to 610 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 11 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 17 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3180 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2900 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Liquid Black, Liquid Silver, Deep Green, Ash Pink | Mineral black, Platinum, Forest blue, Deep pink |
| Models | H8266, H8216, H8296, H8276, 702SO, SOV37 | F8331, F8332, SO-01J, SOV34, 601SO |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.35 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -89.2dB | Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.6dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 72h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1434 (nominal), 3.58 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1349 (nominal), 3.795 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 78dB | Voice 61dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 67dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 259244 (v7), 281749 (v8) GeekBench: 8466 (v4.4), 2060 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | Basemark OS II 2.0: 2151Basemark X: 29548 |
Sony Xperia XZ2
- Significantly better battery life
- More powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Slightly better display sunlight visibility
- Modern design
- Potentially higher price (depending on availability)
- No wireless charging
Sony Xperia XZ
- QC3 fast charging support
- More compact size
- Generally more affordable (if available)
- Shorter battery life
- Older Snapdragon 820 chipset
- Less powerful performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The XZ2 boasts a slightly higher nominal contrast ratio (1434 vs 1349), though both are excellent. The XZ2's sunlight visibility is marginally better (3.58 vs 3.795), making it easier to see outdoors. The XZ2 also has a slightly more modern design with smaller bezels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable cameras, but the XZ2 generally produces slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Both offer excellent video recording capabilities. The XZ2's image processing algorithms are more refined, resulting in more natural-looking photos. Both phones have a dedicated shutter button, a signature Sony feature.
Performance
The XZ2's Snapdragon 845 chipset is a significant upgrade over the XZ's Snapdragon 820. The 845 offers noticeably faster processing speeds and improved graphics performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and better gaming experiences. The XZ2's octa-core CPU also provides a performance advantage over the XZ's quad-core processor.
Battery Life
This is where the XZ2 truly shines. Its endurance rating of 88h significantly surpasses the XZ's 72h. This translates to considerably longer battery life for the XZ2, allowing for more usage between charges. While the XZ supports 18W wired charging (QC3), the XZ2's larger battery capacity compensates for any charging speed differences.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XZ2 is ideal for users who demand strong performance, excellent battery life, and appreciate a modern design. It's a good choice for those who frequently use demanding apps or games. The Xperia XZ remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers seeking a reliable Android phone with a good camera, but be prepared for shorter battery life and slightly slower performance.