Sony Xperia XZ2 vs Samsung Galaxy S9: A Head-to-Head Showdown

The Sony Xperia XZ2 and Samsung Galaxy S9 were flagship contenders in their time, boasting impressive features and performance. But which one holds up best today? We'll break down their key differences to help you decide which phone was the better choice.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Galaxy S9 edges out the XZ2 thanks to its superior sunlight display, slightly more refined software experience, and generally better camera versatility. While the XZ2 boasts impressive battery endurance, the S9's overall package makes it the winner.

PHONES
Phone Names Sony Xperia XZ2 Samsung Galaxy S9
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - USA
Launch
Announced2018, February 26. Released 2018, April 202018, February 25. Released 2018, March 09
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions153 x 72 x 11.1 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 in)147.7 x 68.7 x 8.5 mm (5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight198 g (6.98 oz)163 g (5.75 oz)
 IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density)1440 x 2960 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~570 ppi density)
Size5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio)5.8 inches, 84.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, HDR BT.2020Super AMOLED, HDR10
 Triluminos display X-Reality Engine3D Touch (home button only) Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEAOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) - USA/LATAM, China
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)Exynos 9810 (10 nm) - EMEAQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) - USA/LATAM, China
GPUAdreno 630Mali-G72 MP18 - EMEAAdreno 630 - USA/LATAM, China
OSAndroid 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, One UI 2.5
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model onlymicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM
 UFS 2.1UFS 2.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, auto-HDR, panorama
Single19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS (30fps)
Selfie camera
Dual-8 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.22µm, AF 2 MP (dedicated iris scanner camera)
Features-HDR
Single5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0"-
Video1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS)1440p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioNoFM radio (USA & Canada only)
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNAWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassIris scanner, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2
 -ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified)
Battery
Charging-15W wired, QC2 Wireless (Qi) (market dependent)
TypeLi-Ion 3180 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable (11.55 Wh)
Misc
ColorsLiquid Black, Liquid Silver, Deep Green, Ash PinkMidnight Black, Coral Blue, Titanium Gray, Lilac Purple, Burgundy Red, Sunrise Gold, Ice Blue
ModelsH8266, H8216, H8296, H8276, 702SO, SOV37SM-G960F, SM-G960, SM-G960F, SM-G960U, SM-G960W, SM-G9600, SM-G960U1, SM-G960N, SCV38, SM-G960X, SC-02K
PriceAbout 360 EURAbout 110 EUR
SAR-0.63 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.36 W/kg (head)     1.18 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -89.2dB Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -93.9dB
Battery life Endurance rating 88h Endurance rating 78h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: 1434 (nominal), 3.58 (sunlight) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.630 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker Voice 66dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 78dB Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB
Performance AnTuTu: 259244 (v7), 281749 (v8) GeekBench: 8466 (v4.4), 2060 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) AnTuTu: 250156 (v7) GeekBench: 8830 (v4.4) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Sony Xperia XZ2

  • Exceptional battery life
  • Clean Android experience
  • Water and dust resistance (IP68)
  • Powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset

  • Sunlight display performance could be better
  • Camera lacks some versatility compared to S9
  • Design can feel a bit bland

Samsung Galaxy S9

  • Vibrant and bright display (especially in sunlight)
  • Versatile camera system
  • Feature-rich software
  • Wireless charging (market dependent)

  • Battery life slightly shorter than XZ2
  • Software can feel bloated to some users
  • Design is somewhat dated now

Display Comparison

The Galaxy S9's display is a clear winner. While the XZ2 has a respectable contrast ratio (1434:1), the S9's 'Infinite' contrast ratio and significantly better sunlight performance (4.630 vs 3.58) make it more enjoyable to use outdoors. Both use OLED technology, offering excellent colors and deep blacks.

Camera Comparison

The Galaxy S9's camera system is more versatile. While both offer excellent photo and video capabilities, the S9's image processing tends to produce more pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The S9 also benefits from a variable aperture, allowing for better depth-of-field control. The XZ2's camera is still very capable, but lacks the S9's refinement.

Performance

Both phones are powered by high-end chipsets – the Snapdragon 845 in the XZ2 and either the Exynos 9810 or Snapdragon 845 in the S9 (region dependent). Performance is generally comparable for everyday tasks and gaming, though the S9's slightly newer architecture might offer a marginal edge in some scenarios. The XZ2's 10nm process is identical to the S9's.

Battery Life

The Xperia XZ2 takes the crown in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 88 hours compared to the Galaxy S9's 78 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage between charges, a significant advantage for power users.

Buying Guide

The Sony Xperia XZ2 is a good choice for users prioritizing battery life and a more stock Android experience. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, a versatile camera system, and a more feature-rich software experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally provides longer software update support than Sony, although both are now past their major update cycles. However, Samsung's One UI is more feature-rich.
❓ Is the XZ2 still worth buying?
If battery life is your absolute top priority and you prefer a clean Android experience, the XZ2 can still be a viable option, especially at a reduced price. However, consider the age of the device and potential lack of future updates.