Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact vs. Xperia XZ2: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ2 offers a slightly larger display and marginally better sunlight readability, while the XZ2 Compact shines with its smaller form factor and portability. Both share the same powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset and impressive battery life, making the choice largely dependent on screen size preference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact | Sony Xperia XZ2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, February. Released 2018, April | 2018, February 26. Released 2018, April 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm (5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 in) | 153 x 72 x 11.1 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~483 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0" | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 2870 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3180 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White Silver, Moss Green, Coral Pink | Liquid Black, Liquid Silver, Deep Green, Ash Pink |
| Models | H8324, H8314, SO-05K | H8266, H8216, H8296, H8276, 702SO, SOV37 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -89.2dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1315:1 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1434 (nominal), 3.58 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 83dB | Voice 66dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 78dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 265326 (v7), 308651 (v8) GeekBench: 8487 (v4.4), 2174 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 259244 (v7), 281749 (v8) GeekBench: 8466 (v4.4), 2060 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
- Highly portable and pocketable
- Premium build quality
- Powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Excellent battery life (88h)
- Vibrant OLED display
- Smaller screen may not suit all users
- Camera may slightly lag behind larger XZ2 in low light
Sony Xperia XZ2
- Larger, more immersive display
- Slightly better sunlight readability
- Premium build quality
- Powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Excellent battery life (88h)
- Less pocketable than the Compact
- Can be more difficult to use one-handed
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, known for their vibrant colors and deep blacks. The XZ2 boasts a slightly higher contrast ratio (1434:1 vs 1315:1) and a better sunlight readability score (3.58 vs 3.765), making it easier to view outdoors. However, the XZ2 Compact's smaller 5.0-inch screen might be preferable for those with smaller hands or who value pocketability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature excellent camera systems capable of capturing high-quality photos and videos. While specific camera specs are not detailed, both are known for their fast autofocus and reliable image processing. The XZ2's larger sensor *may* offer a slight advantage in low-light conditions, but real-world differences are likely minimal.
Performance
Under the hood, both devices are powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 chipset and Octa-core CPU. Expect smooth performance for everyday tasks, demanding games, and multitasking. There's virtually no performance difference between the two.
Battery Life
Both the XZ2 Compact and XZ2 share the same impressive endurance rating of 88 hours. This suggests comparable battery life for typical usage, ensuring you can get through a full day or more on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is ideal for users who prioritize portability and one-handed use without sacrificing performance. It's a great choice for those who want a premium experience in a smaller package. The Xperia XZ2 is better suited for users who prefer a larger display for media consumption and gaming, offering a more immersive experience.