Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact vs Xperia X Compact: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset, superior display contrast, and longer battery life. While the X Compact remains a capable device, the XZ2 Compact's performance and features justify its existence.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact | Sony Xperia X Compact |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - F5321 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - F5321 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, February. Released 2018, April | 2016, September 01. Released 2016, September 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm (5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 in) | 129 x 65 x 9.5 mm (5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 135 g (4.76 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~483 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~319 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.6 inches, 58.3 cm2 (~69.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 | IPS LCD |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Hexa-core (4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A72) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8956 Snapdragon 650 |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 510 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | eMMC 4.5 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF | 23 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.3", PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps | 1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0" | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS/ BDS (region dependent) |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 710 h (2G) / Up to 750 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 11 h (2G) / Up to 14 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2870 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White Silver, Moss Green, Coral Pink | White, Universe black, Mist blue |
| Models | H8324, H8314, SO-05K | SO-02J, F5321 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.66 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | Noise -95.1dB / Crosstalk -90.8dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 73h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1315:1 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1225 (nominal), 3.694 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 83dB | Voice 64dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 69dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 265326 (v7), 308651 (v8) GeekBench: 8487 (v4.4), 2174 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | Basemark OS II 2.0: 1738Basemark X: 15415 |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
- Significantly faster performance
- Superior display contrast and sunlight readability
- Longer battery life
- Modern Android experience
- Likely better camera quality
- Potentially higher price (when new)
- May be harder to find new
Sony Xperia X Compact
- More affordable (especially used)
- Compact and pocketable
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower performance
- Lower display contrast
- Shorter battery life
- Older Android version
Display Comparison
The XZ2 Compact's display shines with a higher contrast ratio (1315:1 vs 1225:1) and exceptional sunlight readability (3.765 vs 3.694). Both phones feature similar screen sizes (around 5 inches) and resolutions, but the XZ2 Compact's superior contrast provides a noticeably richer viewing experience. The XZ2 Compact also likely has a more modern display technology, potentially OLED vs LCD.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the XZ2 Compact's more powerful processor and likely more advanced camera hardware (sensor size, aperture) should result in better image quality, especially in low light. The XZ2 Compact likely supports features like 4K video recording and improved image stabilization.
Performance
This is where the XZ2 Compact truly pulls ahead. Its Snapdragon 845 chipset is a significant upgrade over the X Compact's Snapdragon 650. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the XZ2 Compact. The XZ2 Compact's octa-core CPU also offers a considerable advantage over the X Compact's hexa-core processor.
Battery Life
The XZ2 Compact demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, with an endurance rating of 88h compared to the X Compact's 73h. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges, a crucial factor for many users.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is ideal for users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display, and a modern Android experience in a compact form. The Xperia X Compact is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who need a reliable, smaller phone and don't require top-tier performance.