Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact vs Xperia 5: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sony Xperia 5 is the clear winner, offering a superior display, more powerful processor, and slightly better battery life. While the XZ2 Compact's compact size is appealing, the Xperia 5's overall improvements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact | Sony Xperia 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat19 1600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, February. Released 2018, April | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, October 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm (5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 in) | 158 x 68 x 8.2 mm (6.22 x 2.68 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 164 g (5.78 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~483 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 | OLED, HDR BT.2020 |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, predictive dual pixel PDAF, 5-axis OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, predictive PDAF, 2x optical zoom, 5-axis OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps | 4K@24/30fps HDR, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (5-axis gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps (5-axis gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 2870 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3140 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White Silver, Moss Green, Coral Pink | Blue, Red, Black, Grey |
| Models | H8324, H8314, SO-05K | J8210, J8270, J9210, SOV41, SO-01M |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 409.99 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 674.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -89.4dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1315:1 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 83dB | -27.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 265326 (v7), 308651 (v8) GeekBench: 8487 (v4.4), 2174 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 334809 (v7), 416601 (v8) GeekBench: 10941 (v4.4), 2825 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
- Extremely compact and pocketable
- Decent performance for its size
- Good contrast ratio display
- Water and dust resistant
- Smaller display
- Less powerful processor
- Single rear camera
- Older model
Sony Xperia 5
- Larger, brighter OLED display
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Versatile triple-lens camera system
- Slightly better battery life
- Modern design
- Larger size (less pocketable)
- Higher price
- 18W charging is relatively slow compared to competitors
Display Comparison
The Xperia 5 boasts a significant advantage with its 6.5-inch OLED display, offering a higher resolution and a measured peak brightness of 630 nits. The XZ2 Compact's 5.0-inch display is smaller and has a lower resolution, though its contrast ratio is impressive at 1315:1. The Xperia 5's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but the OLED technology provides excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Xperia 5 also supports HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable cameras, but the Xperia 5 has a more versatile setup. The Xperia 5 features a triple-lens system (main, ultrawide, telephoto) offering greater flexibility in framing shots. The XZ2 Compact has a single rear camera, which is still good but lacks the versatility of the Xperia 5. Both phones capture decent video, but the Xperia 5's processing is generally more refined.
Performance
The Xperia 5's Snapdragon 855 chipset and 6GB of RAM provide a noticeable performance boost over the XZ2 Compact's Snapdragon 845 and likely 4GB of RAM. The 855 offers improved CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. Both phones handle everyday tasks well, but the Xperia 5 excels in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
Both phones have an endurance rating of 88h/96h respectively, suggesting comparable battery life. However, the Xperia 5's larger battery capacity (3600mAh vs XZ2 Compact's 2700mAh) contributes to its slightly longer endurance. Both support 18W fast charging.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is ideal for users prioritizing a truly pocketable phone with decent performance and a familiar Sony experience. It's a good option for those who value portability above all else. The Sony Xperia 5 is best suited for users who want a larger, brighter display, faster performance, and a more modern camera system, without sacrificing too much on size.