Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact vs Xperia 10 V: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia 10 V offers a significant upgrade in battery life and 5G connectivity, alongside a brighter display. While the XZ2 Compact boasts a more powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset, the 10 V's modern features and longevity make it the overall winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact | Sony Xperia 10 V |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, February. Released 2018, April | 2023, May 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, June 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm (5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 in) | 155 x 68 x 8.3 mm (6.10 x 2.68 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~483 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 | OLED, 1B colors, HDR |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | Wired, PD, QC |
| Type | Li-Ion 2870 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White Silver, Moss Green, Coral Pink | Black, White, Sage Green, Lavender |
| Models | H8324, H8314, SO-05K | XQ-DC72, XQ-DC54 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 225.00 / $ 699.00 / £ 194.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 175h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1315:1 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 83dB | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 265326 (v7), 308651 (v8) GeekBench: 8487 (v4.4), 2174 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 357142 (v9) GeekBench: 1897 (v5.5), 2067 (v6) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
- Compact size
- Powerful Snapdragon 845
- Excellent sunlight readability
- Good value (used)
- Older model
- Shorter battery life
- Outdated software support
- Lower screen brightness
Sony Xperia 10 V
- Long battery life
- 5G connectivity
- Bright display
- Modern design
- Good value
- Less powerful processor
- Camera details are limited
- Potentially less responsive UI
Display Comparison
The Xperia 10 V takes the display crown with a significantly brighter screen (947 nits vs. XZ2 Compact's unknown brightness) and an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. The XZ2 Compact's contrast ratio of 1315:1 is still respectable, and its sunlight readability (3.765) is impressive, but the 10 V's overall brightness provides a better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the Xperia 10 V's newer sensor and image processing algorithms likely provide better image quality, especially in low light. The XZ2 Compact's camera was decent for its time, but it's showing its age.
Performance
The XZ2 Compact holds an advantage here. Its Snapdragon 845 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Xperia 10 V's Snapdragon 695 5G. This translates to smoother performance in demanding games and applications. However, the 10 V's 6nm process offers improved efficiency.
Battery Life
The Xperia 10 V dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 175h significantly surpasses the XZ2 Compact's 88h. This difference is a major factor for users who prioritize all-day (or multi-day) battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is ideal for users prioritizing a compact form factor and raw processing power, especially those on a budget. The Xperia 10 V is a better choice for those needing long battery life, 5G connectivity, and a brighter display, even if it means sacrificing some processing speed.