Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact vs Xperia 10 IV: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia 10 IV wins overall due to its significantly longer battery life, brighter display, and 5G connectivity. However, the XZ2 Compact boasts a more powerful Snapdragon 845 chipset and a more compact form factor, appealing to those prioritizing performance in a smaller package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact | Sony Xperia 10 IV |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, February. Released 2018, April | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, June 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm (5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 in) | 153 x 67 x 8.3 mm (6.02 x 2.64 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~483 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~457 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 84.1 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 | OLED, 1B colors, HDR |
| Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | Triluminos display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0" | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 21W wired (unofficial rating), PD, QC |
| Type | Li-Ion 2870 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White Silver, Moss Green, Coral Pink | Black, White, Mint, Lavender |
| Models | H8324, H8314, SO-05K | XQ-CC54, XQ-CC72, SOG07 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | £ 99.99 / € 112.89 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 163h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1315:1 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 83dB | -30.6 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 265326 (v7), 308651 (v8) GeekBench: 8487 (v4.4), 2174 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 396008 (v9) GeekBench: 1908 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
- Compact size
- Powerful Snapdragon 845
- Excellent contrast ratio display
- QC3 fast charging
- Older model
- Shorter battery life
- Camera showing its age
- No 5G
Sony Xperia 10 IV
- Long battery life
- Brighter display
- 5G connectivity
- Larger screen
- PD & QC charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Mid-range performance
- Potentially less premium build quality
Display Comparison
The Xperia 10 IV features a significantly brighter display (683 nits) compared to the XZ2 Compact. While the XZ2 Compact boasts an impressive contrast ratio of 1315:1, the Xperia 10 IV claims an 'infinite' contrast ratio, likely due to its OLED panel. The Xperia 10 IV's larger screen also provides a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Generally, the Xperia 10 IV, being a newer model, likely has improved image processing and potentially more versatile camera features. The XZ2 Compact's camera was decent for its time, but it's showing its age.
Performance
The XZ2 Compact holds a clear advantage in raw performance thanks to its Snapdragon 845 chipset. This translates to snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Xperia 10 IV's Snapdragon 695 5G is a capable mid-range chip, but it doesn't match the XZ2 Compact's power.
Battery Life
The Xperia 10 IV dominates in battery life, offering an endurance rating of 163 hours compared to the XZ2 Compact's 88 hours. This is a substantial difference, making the Xperia 10 IV a much better choice for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact? Users who value a truly pocketable phone with flagship-level performance from a few years ago. Who should buy the Sony Xperia 10 IV? Those seeking a larger display, excellent battery life, and 5G connectivity in a mid-range device.