Sony Xperia XZ1 vs XZs: A Deep Dive into Sony's Flagship Choices

Released within a year of each other, the Sony Xperia XZ1 and XZs represent Sony’s attempts to refine the compact flagship formula. While both share a similar aesthetic and core Sony features, significant internal differences – particularly in their chipsets – dictate their performance and efficiency. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone offers the best value in today’s market.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Sony Xperia XZ1 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 835 offers a noticeable performance boost over the XZs’ Snapdragon 820, coupled with improved battery endurance. While the XZs remains a capable device, the XZ1’s efficiency and power justify the price difference.

PHONES
Phone Names Sony Xperia XZ1 Sony Xperia XZs
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (G8232)
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - F8341, F8342HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G8231, G8232
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - G83411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G8231, G8232
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat9 450/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 29, 38, 40, 41, 66 - G8343-
Launch
Announced2017, August 31. Released 2017, September 192017, February 27. Released 2017, April 03
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, plastic frame
Dimensions148 x 73.4 x 7.4 mm (5.83 x 2.89 x 0.29 in)146 x 72 x 8.1 mm (5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM (G8231)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G8232)
Weight155 g (5.47 oz)161 g (5.68 oz)
 IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density)1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density)
Size5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~68.6% screen-to-body ratio)5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, HDR10IPS LCD
 Triluminos display X-Reality EngineTriluminos display X-Reality Engine
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo)Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo)
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm)Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm)
GPUAdreno 540Adreno 530
OSAndroid 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie)Android 7.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model onlymicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 UFS 2.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", predictive PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps, HDR
Selfie camera
Single13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3"13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS)1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE4.2, A2DP, aptX, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNAWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (side-mounted, region dependent), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired, QC318W wired, QC3
TypeLi-Ion 2700 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 2900 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, Warm Silver, Venus Pink, Moonlit BlueBlack, Warm Silver, Ice Blue
ModelsG8341, G8342, F8341, F8342, G8343, SOV36, SO-01KG8232, G8231, SOV35, 602SO, SO-03J
PriceAbout 260 EURAbout 220 EUR
Tests
Audio quality Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -90.2dB Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB
Battery life Endurance rating 82h Endurance rating 73h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: 1406 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) Contrast ratio: 1223:1 (nominal), 3.818 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker Voice 65dB / Noise 68dB / Ring 69dB Voice 62dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 73dB
Performance GeekBench: 6541 (v4.4), 1527 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) AnTuTu: 170766 (v8) GeekBench: 808 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Sony Xperia XZ1

  • Superior performance with Snapdragon 835
  • Longer battery life (82h endurance)
  • Higher display contrast ratio for better visuals

  • Potentially higher price point
  • May be harder to find new

Sony Xperia XZs

  • More affordable price (likely)
  • Still a capable performer for everyday tasks
  • Comparable sunlight display readability

  • Older Snapdragon 820 chipset
  • Shorter battery life (73h endurance)
  • Lower display contrast ratio

Display Comparison

Both the XZ1 and XZs feature similar displays, but the XZ1 edges ahead with a higher contrast ratio of 1406 (nominal) and 3.765 (sunlight) compared to the XZs’ 1223:1 (nominal) and 3.818 (sunlight). While the sunlight readability is comparable, the nominal contrast suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors on the XZ1. Both likely utilize Sony’s TRILUMINOS display technology for color accuracy, but the XZ1’s superior contrast contributes to a more visually engaging experience. The lack of information on refresh rates suggests both operate at a standard 60Hz.

Camera Comparison

Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given Sony’s expertise in imaging, both likely offer excellent image quality. However, the XZ1’s more powerful processor allows for faster image processing and potentially more advanced computational photography features. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner, but the XZ1’s processing power gives it an edge in post-capture enhancements and video stabilization.

Performance

The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The XZ1 boasts the Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, fabricated on a 10nm process, while the XZs utilizes the older MSM8996 Snapdragon 820, built on a 14nm process. This process node difference is crucial; the 10nm Snapdragon 835 is significantly more power-efficient, translating to better battery life and reduced thermal throttling. The CPU architecture also differs: the XZ1’s octa-core configuration (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) provides a substantial performance advantage over the XZs’ quad-core setup (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo). This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the XZ1.

Battery Life

The Xperia XZ1’s endurance rating of 82 hours significantly surpasses the XZs’ 73 hours. This difference directly correlates with the Snapdragon 835’s superior power efficiency. While both phones support 18W wired charging with QC3, the XZ1’s more efficient chipset means it will likely reach full charge faster and maintain that charge for a longer period during typical usage. The XZ1’s battery life advantage is a key benefit for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day.

Buying Guide

Buy the Sony Xperia XZ1 if you prioritize performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value longer battery life. Its newer chipset and optimized power consumption make it ideal for power users. Buy the Sony Xperia XZs if you are on a tighter budget and primarily use your phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and basic photography. The XZs provides a solid experience at a potentially lower cost, but compromises on raw processing power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 820 in the XZs struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 820 is capable of running many games, but it may experience noticeable throttling and frame drops in graphically intensive titles like Genshin Impact, especially during extended play sessions. The XZ1’s Snapdragon 835, with its more efficient architecture, will provide a smoother and more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the battery life improvement of the XZ1 make?
The 9-hour endurance rating difference translates to a noticeable improvement in daily use. XZ1 users can expect to comfortably get through a full day of moderate to heavy use, while XZs users might need to top up their battery before the end of the day, especially with demanding applications.
❓ Is the difference in display contrast noticeable in everyday use?
While both displays are good, the XZ1’s higher contrast ratio will be most noticeable when viewing content with deep blacks, such as movies or dark-themed apps. Colors will appear more vibrant and images will have more depth on the XZ1.