Sony Xperia XA2 vs Xperia XZ2 Compact: The Ultimate Compact Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ2 Compact wins decisively. While the XA2 boasts impressive battery life, the XZ2 Compact's significantly faster processor, superior camera, and brighter display make it the better choice for most users, despite a slightly shorter endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XA2 | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - H3123 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 28, 29, 66 - H3123 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat13 600/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat15 800/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - H3133, H4133 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, February | 2018, February. Released 2018, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 142 x 70 x 9.7 mm (5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 in) | 135 x 65 x 12.1 mm (5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~483 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~75.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 508 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 23 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.3", PDAF | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec., HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/4.0" | 5 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/5.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2870 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Black, Blue, Pink | Black, White Silver, Moss Green, Coral Pink |
| Models | H4113, H3113, H4133, H3123 | H8324, H8314, SO-05K |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -92.8dB / Crosstalk -87.8dB | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 92h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1327:1 (nominal), 2.938 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1315:1 (nominal), 3.765 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 68dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 78dB | Voice 66dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 83dB |
| Performance | GeekBench: 4215 (v4.4) GFXBench: 6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 265326 (v7), 308651 (v8) GeekBench: 8487 (v4.4), 2174 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XA2
- Exceptional battery life
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Compact and lightweight design
- Good value for money
- Slower processor compared to flagship phones
- Less impressive camera
- Lower screen brightness
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
- Flagship-level performance
- Superior camera quality
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Water resistance
- Slightly shorter battery life than XA2
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays with excellent contrast ratios (1327:1 nominal). However, the XZ2 Compact shines with a significantly better sunlight readability score (3.765 vs 2.938), making it easier to view outdoors. The XZ2 Compact also generally offers slightly more vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
The XZ2 Compact's camera is superior, offering better image quality, faster autofocus, and improved low-light performance. While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the XZ2 Compact's image processing and hardware are simply better. Expect more detail and dynamic range in photos taken with the XZ2 Compact.
Performance
This is where the XZ2 Compact truly pulls ahead. Its Snapdragon 845 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the XA2's Snapdragon 630. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the XZ2 Compact. The XA2 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The XA2 holds a slight edge in battery endurance, boasting a rated 92h compared to the XZ2 Compact's 88h. However, real-world usage often closes this gap, and the XZ2 Compact's more efficient processor can mitigate the difference.
Buying Guide
The Xperia XA2 is a good option for budget-conscious users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a smooth, albeit less powerful, experience. The Xperia XZ2 Compact is ideal for those seeking a premium compact phone with flagship-level performance, a better camera, and a brighter display, willing to spend a bit more.