Sony Xperia XA2 vs Xperia XZ2: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ2 is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful processor, a brighter display, and a generally more premium experience. While the XA2 offers impressive battery life, the XZ2's performance and display advancements make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XA2 | Sony Xperia XZ2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - H3123 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 28, 29, 66 - H3123 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat13 600/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - H3133, H4133 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, February | 2018, February 26. Released 2018, April 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 142 x 70 x 9.7 mm (5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 in) | 153 x 72 x 11.1 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~75.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 508 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 23 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.3", PDAF | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec., HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/4.0" | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3180 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Black, Blue, Pink | Liquid Black, Liquid Silver, Deep Green, Ash Pink |
| Models | H4113, H3113, H4133, H3123 | H8266, H8216, H8296, H8276, 702SO, SOV37 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -92.8dB / Crosstalk -87.8dB | Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -89.2dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 92h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1327:1 (nominal), 2.938 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1434 (nominal), 3.58 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 68dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 78dB | Voice 66dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 78dB |
| Performance | GeekBench: 4215 (v4.4) GFXBench: 6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 259244 (v7), 281749 (v8) GeekBench: 8466 (v4.4), 2060 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XA2
- Excellent battery life
- Compact and lightweight design
- Good value for money (especially now)
- Decent display contrast
- Slower processor
- Less vibrant display
- Camera not as advanced
- Older model
Sony Xperia XZ2
- Powerful Snapdragon 845 processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Better camera performance
- Premium build quality
- Slightly shorter battery life
- More expensive (originally)
- Older model
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays with excellent contrast ratios (1327:1 for XA2, 1434:1 for XZ2). However, the XZ2's display shines brighter, particularly in sunlight (2.938 vs 3.58), offering better visibility outdoors. The XZ2 also generally has more vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the XZ2 generally produces better image quality, especially in low light. The XZ2's image processing is more advanced, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos. Both offer video recording capabilities, but the XZ2's processing often results in smoother footage.
Performance
The XZ2's Snapdragon 845 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the XA2's Snapdragon 630. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The XZ2 handles demanding tasks with ease, while the XA2 can occasionally feel sluggish.
Battery Life
The XA2 holds a slight edge in battery endurance with a rated 92h compared to the XZ2's 88h. However, real-world usage can vary, and the XZ2's more efficient processor often mitigates the difference.
Buying Guide
The Xperia XA2 is a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize long battery life and a compact form factor. The Xperia XZ2 is ideal for those seeking a faster processor, a better display, and a more premium build quality, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.