Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra vs. Xperia XZ Premium: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XZ Premium is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster processor, superior camera, and a more premium build. However, the XA2 Ultra offers exceptional battery life and a larger display at a more budget-friendly price point. It's a trade-off between power and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | Sony Xperia XZ Premium |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 - G8142 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - H3213, H4213, H4233 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G8141, G8142 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 - H3213, H4213 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G8141, G8142 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat13 600/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, February | 2017, February 27. Released 2017, June 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum/plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 80 x 9.5 mm (6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 in) | 156 x 77 x 7.9 mm (6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM (G8141)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G8142) |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~367 ppi density) | 3840 x 2160 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~807 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.46 inches, 82.2 cm2 (~68.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| - | Runs at 1080 x 1920 pixels except for select use cases Triluminos display X-Reality Engine | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 508 | Adreno 540 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 7.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 23 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.3", PDAF | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", predictive PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec., HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/2.6", OIS, AF 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/4.0" | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30ps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted, region dependent), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3580 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3230 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Black, Blue, Gold | Luminous Chrome, Deepsea Black, Bronze Pink, Rosso |
| Models | H4213, H4233, H3213, H3223 | G8142, G8141, SO-04K, SO-04J |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 320 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -67.7dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB | Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 72h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1562:1 (nominal), 3.445 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: 1238:1 (nominal), 2.877 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 68dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 80dB | Voice 62dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 71dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 89110 (v7) GeekBench: 4198 (v4.4) GFXBench: 6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | GeekBench: 5460 (v4.4), 1603 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life
- Large 6-inch display
- Affordable price
- Good sunlight readability
- Lower performance
- Less premium design
- Camera not as advanced
- Older chipset
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
- Flagship performance
- Excellent camera with 4K HDR
- Premium design and build quality
- 4K HDR display
- Shorter battery life
- Higher price
- Smaller display compared to XA2 Ultra
Display Comparison
The XA2 Ultra features a 6-inch Full HD+ display with a contrast ratio of 1562:1 (nominal) and impressive 3.445 sunlight readability. The XZ Premium has a 5.5-inch 4K HDR display with a contrast ratio of 1238:1 (nominal) and a sunlight readability of 2.877. While the XA2 Ultra's screen is larger, the XZ Premium's 4K resolution and HDR support offer a sharper, more vibrant image, especially noticeable in supported content.
Camera Comparison
The XZ Premium's camera is a significant upgrade. It features a 19MP rear camera with predictive capture and 4K HDR video recording, alongside a 13MP front camera. The XA2 Ultra's camera is capable but lacks the advanced features and image processing capabilities of the XZ Premium. Low-light performance is noticeably better on the XZ Premium.
Performance
The XZ Premium's Snapdragon 835 chipset and Octa-core Kryo CPU provide a substantial performance advantage over the XA2 Ultra's Snapdragon 630. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the XZ Premium. The XA2 Ultra is adequate for everyday tasks but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The XA2 Ultra shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 100 hours, significantly outperforming the XZ Premium's 72-hour rating. This makes the XA2 Ultra a better choice for users who need a phone that can last through multiple days of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra is ideal for users prioritizing battery life, a large screen for media consumption, and a more affordable price. The Xperia XZ Premium is best suited for those who demand top-tier performance, a flagship camera, and a premium design, regardless of cost.