Sony Xperia L3 vs Xperia XA2: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia XA2 edges out the L3 thanks to its superior chipset, faster charging, and excellent sunlight display performance. While the L3 boasts impressive battery endurance, the XA2's overall performance and features make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia L3 | Sony Xperia XA2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - I3312, I4312, I4332 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - H3123 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 - I3312, I4312 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 28, 29, 66 - H3123 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat13 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 29 - I3322 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - H3133, H4133 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, February | 2018, January. Released 2018, February |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 154 x 72 x 8.9 mm (6.06 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) | 142 x 70 x 9.7 mm (5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 156 g (5.50 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~75.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~75.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 508 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 8.0 (Oreo) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 23 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.3", PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec., HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/4.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Silver | Silver, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Models | I3312, I4312, I4332, I3322 | H4113, H3113, H4133, H3123 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -91.9dB / Crosstalk -89.3dB | Noise -92.8dB / Crosstalk -87.8dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 80h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1818:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1327:1 (nominal), 2.938 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 81dB | Voice 68dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 78dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 78894 (v7) GFXBench: 5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | GeekBench: 4215 (v4.4) GFXBench: 6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia L3
- Excellent battery life
- High contrast ratio display
- Affordable price
- Slower performance
- Less refined camera
- No fast charging
Sony Xperia XA2
- Faster performance (Snapdragon 630)
- Excellent sunlight display
- Fast charging (QC3)
- Sleek design
- Slightly shorter battery life than L3
- Older model
Display Comparison
The Xperia XA2 features a contrast ratio of 1327:1 (nominal) and an impressive 2.938 rating in sunlight, making it significantly easier to view outdoors. The L3's 1818:1 contrast ratio is good, but lacks the XA2's sunlight readability. Both utilize IPS LCD panels, offering decent color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature standard camera setups for their time. While specific camera specs are similar (Photo/Video), the XA2's superior processor generally leads to better image processing and low-light performance. The L3's camera is adequate but lacks the XA2's refinement.
Performance
The Xperia XA2's Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset (14nm) provides a noticeable performance boost over the L3's Mediatek Helio P22 (12nm). The XA2's CPU clocks slightly higher (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz), resulting in snappier app loading and smoother multitasking. Gaming performance is also better on the XA2.
Battery Life
The Xperia L3 holds a slight advantage in raw battery endurance, boasting an 80-hour rating compared to the XA2's 92-hour rating. However, the XA2's support for 18W wired charging (QC3) allows for significantly faster charging times, offsetting the slight difference in endurance.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia L3 is a good option for budget-conscious users prioritizing long battery life and a high contrast display. The Xperia XA2 is ideal for those seeking a smoother performance, faster charging, and better outdoor visibility, willing to spend a bit more.