Sony Xperia L3 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. While the Xperia L3 boasts impressive endurance ratings, the A54's superior performance, brighter display, and more modern features make it a significantly better overall package, justifying its higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia L3 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - I3312, I4312, I4332 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 - I3312, I4312 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 29 - I3322 | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, February | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 154 x 72 x 8.9 mm (6.06 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 156 g (5.50 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~75.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | USB Power Delivery | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | I3312, I4312, I4332, I3322 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -91.9dB / Crosstalk -89.3dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 80h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1818:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 81dB | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 78894 (v7) GFXBench: 5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia L3
- Exceptional battery life (80h endurance)
- High contrast ratio display (1818:1)
- Compact size
- USB Power Delivery
- Outdated chipset (Helio P22)
- Lower screen brightness
- Less powerful camera
- Slower performance
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Powerful processor (Exynos 1380)
- Bright and vibrant display (980 nits)
- Excellent camera system
- Modern design
- Good battery life (119h endurance)
- Slightly higher price
- 25W charging (could be faster)
- No expandable storage
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A54's display is a clear winner. Its 980 nits max brightness provides excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a feature the Xperia L3 lacks. The 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests superior color accuracy and deeper blacks compared to the L3's 1818:1 ratio. The A54 likely also features a higher resolution and more vibrant color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Galaxy A54 is expected to deliver superior image quality. Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded, and the A54's hardware is likely more advanced, resulting in better detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The L3's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is significantly more powerful than the Mediatek Helio P22 in the Xperia L3. The A54's 5nm process and Cortex-A78 cores offer a substantial performance boost for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications. The L3 will feel sluggish in comparison.
Battery Life
Both phones have impressive endurance ratings, with the Galaxy A54 slightly edging out the L3. However, the A54's active use score of 11:15h suggests it can handle more intensive tasks without significant battery drain. The L3's 80h endurance rating is likely based on very light usage.
Buying Guide
The Sony Xperia L3 is a good choice for users on a very tight budget who prioritize exceptional battery life above all else. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is ideal for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a great display, capable camera, and solid performance for everyday tasks and light gaming.