Sony Xperia 10 V vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Display
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Sony Xperia 10 V is the clear winner, boasting a 16:14 active use score and a 175-hour endurance rating. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo counters with significantly faster 68W charging and a brighter display, making it ideal for those who value convenience and visual vibrancy.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia 10 V | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 11 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 21 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 155 x 68 x 8.3 mm (6.10 x 2.68 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 159 g (5.61 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Triluminos display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD, QC | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Sage Green, Lavender | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | XQ-DC72, XQ-DC54 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 225.00 / $ 699.00 / £ 194.99 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 175h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.4 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 357142 (v9) GeekBench: 1897 (v5.5), 2067 (v6) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Sony Xperia 10 V
- Exceptional battery life (175h endurance)
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Reliable all-day performance
- Less powerful processor compared to the Edge 40 Neo
- Lower peak display brightness
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life (80h endurance)
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits compared to the Xperia 10 V’s 947 nits. This difference translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays utilize a 6nm process, but the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness is immediately noticeable. While both have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the real-world impact of panel technology (LTPO, HDR support) isn’t specified in the provided data, suggesting both likely use standard OLED panels. Bezels are not detailed, but the Edge 40 Neo’s overall design language leans towards a more modern aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. Without specifics on megapixel count, sensor size, or aperture, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the absence of any mention of advanced features like OIS on either device suggests a focus on computational photography rather than high-end optics. The lack of detail implies both cameras are geared towards casual photography rather than enthusiast-level image capture. We can assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance is likely to be a weak point for both.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Sony Xperia 10 V utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo features the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (also 6nm). The Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a clock speed advantage over the Xperia 10 V’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This suggests the Edge 40 Neo will deliver snappier performance in demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Snapdragon 695 is known for its efficient power consumption, contributing to the Xperia 10 V’s superior battery life. RAM specifications are missing, but the chipset difference is the primary performance differentiator.
Battery Life
The Sony Xperia 10 V dominates in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 16:14 hours of active use and a 175-hour endurance rating. This is significantly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28 hours of active use and 80-hour endurance rating. While the Edge 40 Neo compensates with 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes, the Xperia 10 V’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The difference in battery life is substantial, making the Xperia 10 V the clear choice for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sony Xperia 10 V if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use, or even two days of moderate use, and you don't mind a slightly less powerful processor. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone with a more vibrant display, faster charging capabilities, and a more modern chipset for smoother multitasking and gaming, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.