Sony Xperia 10 III vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and a vibrant viewing experience, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its 68W charging and substantially brighter 1004-nit display outweigh the Xperia 10 III’s superior battery endurance, especially given the relatively small difference in overall runtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sony Xperia 10 III | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 14 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 11 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 154 x 68 x 8.3 mm (6.06 x 2.68 x 0.33 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~457 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 84.1 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Triluminos display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 54mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0" | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired (unofficial rating), PD, QC | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Pink | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | SO-52B, SOG04, XQ-BT52, A102SO | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 137h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.2 LUFS (Average) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 286216 (v8) GeekBench: 1738 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sony Xperia 10 III
- Exceptional battery endurance (137h rating)
- More understated and classic Sony design
- Potentially more durable build quality (based on Sony's reputation)
- Dimmer display makes outdoor visibility challenging
- Slow charging speed (21W)
- Older chipset architecture
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly brighter display (1004 nits)
- Ultra-fast 68W wired charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Shorter battery endurance (104h rating)
- Wireless charging is slow at 5W
- Motorola's software update track record is less consistent than Sony's
Display Comparison
The most immediately noticeable difference lies in the displays. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter panel, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to the Xperia 10 III’s 559 nits. This translates to vastly improved visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting standard OLED characteristics. While neither phone specifies advanced panel technology like LTPO, the Edge 30 Neo’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who consume a lot of content on the go. The Xperia 10 III’s dimmer screen may require users to seek shade or increase brightness, impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited in the provided data. Both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities. Without sensor size or megapixel counts, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Motorola’s recent focus on camera improvements, and the Edge 30 Neo’s overall more modern feature set, it’s reasonable to assume a slight advantage in image processing and potentially low-light performance. The absence of detail regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
Both devices utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon 6-series chipsets, but with key architectural differences. The Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 5G, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a slight CPU performance edge with its 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores versus the Xperia 10 III’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold cores. While both feature an octa-core configuration with similar Kryo Silver efficiency cores, the 6nm node of the 695 should result in better thermal management and potentially sustained performance during prolonged tasks. However, the real-world performance difference will likely be subtle for everyday use; neither phone is positioned as a gaming powerhouse.
Battery Life
The Sony Xperia 10 III claims a superior endurance rating of 137 hours, compared to the Edge 30 Neo’s 104 hours. This suggests the Xperia 10 III will last longer on a single charge under typical usage. However, the Edge 30 Neo compensates with a dramatically faster 68W wired charging capability, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Xperia 10 III’s unofficial 21W rating. The Edge 30 Neo also adds 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Xperia 10 III. The trade-off is clear: longer runtime versus significantly faster replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sony Xperia 10 III if you absolutely need the longest possible battery life between charges and value a more understated design. This phone is ideal for users who frequently travel or are away from power outlets for extended periods. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize a bright, vivid display for media consumption and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging – perfect for users who want to quickly top up their phone throughout the day.