Remember the days of Sony Ericsson smartphones? Two contenders from that era, the Xperia X2 and the Vivaz Pro, offer a glimpse into early smartphone innovation. But which one holds up better today? This comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro edges out the Xperia X2 thanks to its faster processor, dedicated GPU, and slightly improved multimedia capabilities. While both are relics of the past, the Vivaz Pro provides a marginally smoother and more enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/2 Mbps | HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - XPERIA X2a | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2009, September. Released 2010, January | 2010, February. Released 2010, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 110 x 54 x 16 mm (4.33 x 2.13 x 0.63 in) | 109 x 52 x 15 mm (4.29 x 2.05 x 0.59 in) |
| Keyboard | QWERTY | QWERTY |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 117 g (4.13 oz) |
| | Optical trackpad | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~292 ppi density) | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.2 inches, 29.1 cm2 (~49.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~49.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors | TFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colors |
| | XPERIA panels UI | Handwriting recognition |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 528 MHz ARM 11 | 720 MHz, PowerVR SGX GPU |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM7200A | - |
| GPU | Adreno 130 | - |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5/6.5.2 Professional | Symbian Series 60, 5th edition |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 8 GB included |
| Internal | 110MB 256MB RAM 512MB ROM | 75MB |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | w480p@30fps | 720p@24fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| | Videocall, via SW update | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | 2.1, A2DP |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS; Wisepilot navigation |
| Radio | Stereo FM (via software update) | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11b/g, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/HTML (IE), RSS feeds | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (NetFront) |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| | MP3/WAV/eAAC+/WMA player
MP4/Xvid/WMV9/H.264 player
TV Out
YouTube application
Pocket Office
Photo editor
Organizer
Voice memo/dial
Predictive text input | Facebook and Twitter apps
WMV/RV/MP4/3GP player
MP3/WMA/WAV/RA/AAC/M4A player
TrackID music recognition
TV out (VGA resolution)
Organizer
Document viewer
Voice memo
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 20 h | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 500 h (2G) / Up to 640 h (3G) | Up to 430 h (2G) / Up to 440 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 10 h (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G) | Up to 12 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 10 min (3G) |
| Type | Removable Li-Po 1500 mAh battery (BST-41) | Removable Li-Po 1200 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Elegant Black, Modern Silver | Black, White |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.90 W/kg (head) | 1.03 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -81.3dB / Crosstalk -93.1dB |
Noise -88.0dB / Crosstalk -88.7dB |
| Camera |
Photo |
Photo |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 66dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 65dB |
Voice 69dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 72dB |
Sony Ericsson Xperia X2
- Compact design
- Relatively durable
- Simple user interface
- Slow performance
- Outdated software
- Limited features
- Mediocre camera
Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro
- Faster processor
- Dedicated GPU
- OLED display
- Slightly better multimedia
- Outdated software
- Limited features
- Mediocre camera
- Shorter battery life than X2
Display Comparison
Both phones featured relatively small displays by today's standards. The Xperia X2 had a 3.2-inch display, while the Vivaz Pro boasted a 3.2-inch OLED screen. The OLED technology on the Vivaz Pro offered slightly better contrast and color reproduction, giving it a visual edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones were marketed with their camera capabilities, but both were limited by the technology of the time. Both featured 'photo' cameras, implying basic image capture. Image quality was generally mediocre by modern standards, with limited resolution and poor low-light performance. There's no significant difference in camera quality between the two.
Performance
The Vivaz Pro's 720 MHz processor and PowerVR SGX GPU significantly outperform the Xperia X2's 528 MHz ARM 11 processor. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother web browsing, and a more responsive overall experience on the Vivaz Pro. The X2 felt noticeably slower.
Battery Life
Battery life was a common concern for smartphones of this era. The Xperia X2 typically offered around 8-10 hours of talk time, while the Vivaz Pro provided a similar, but slightly shorter, battery life of around 6-8 hours. Both required frequent charging.
Buying Guide
The Xperia X2 might appeal to collectors or those seeking a very basic, functional smartphone experience. The Vivaz Pro is a slightly better choice for anyone wanting a bit more performance and multimedia features, though both are largely obsolete for modern use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones still usable in 2024?
While technically usable, both phones are severely outdated. They lack modern features, have limited app compatibility, and are vulnerable to security risks. They are best suited for collectors or nostalgic users.
❓ Which phone is better for playing games?
The Vivaz Pro is significantly better for gaming due to its faster processor and dedicated GPU. However, even with those advantages, game compatibility and performance will be limited.
