Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro vs Vivaz Pro: A Detailed Showdown

The Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro and Vivaz Pro represent a snapshot of the late 2000s smartphone landscape. Both devices aimed to deliver a compelling user experience, but with different approaches. This review dives deep into a comparison of these two phones, examining their strengths and weaknesses to help you understand which one held up better over time.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro edges out the X10 mini pro thanks to its faster processor, dedicated GPU, and slightly improved overall performance. While both are dated, the Vivaz Pro offers a more responsive and enjoyable experience, making it the preferable choice for those seeking a nostalgic smartphone.

PHONES
Phone Names	Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro	Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 900 / 2100	HSDPA 900 / 2100
Speed	HSPA 7.2/2 Mbps	HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA	GSM / HSPA
	HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100

Launch
Announced	2010, February. Released 2010, June	2010, February. Released 2010, May
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Dimensions	90 x 52 x 17 mm (3.54 x 2.05 x 0.67 in)	109 x 52 x 15 mm (4.29 x 2.05 x 0.59 in)
Keyboard	QWERTY	QWERTY
SIM	Mini-SIM	Mini-SIM
Weight	120 g (4.23 oz)	117 g (4.13 oz)

Display
Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
Resolution	240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~157 ppi density)	360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density)
Size	2.55 inches, 20.1 cm2 (~43.0% screen-to-body ratio)	3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~49.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	TFT (65K effective)	TFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colors
	Timescape UI	Handwriting recognition

Platform
CPU	600 MHz ARM 11	720 MHz, PowerVR SGX GPU
Chipset	Qualcomm MSM7227 Snapdragon S1	-
GPU	Adreno 200	-
OS	Android 1.6 (Donut), upgradable to 2.1 (Eclair)	Symbian Series 60, 5th edition

Memory
Card slot	microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included	microSDHC (dedicated slot), 8 GB included
Internal	128MB	75MB

Main Camera
Features	LED flash	LED flash
Single	5 MP, AF	5 MP, AF
Video	480p@30fps	720p@24fps

Selfie camera
	No	No

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	2.1, A2DP	2.1, A2DP
Positioning	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS; Wisepilot navigation
Radio	Stereo FM radio, RDS	Stereo FM radio, RDS
USB	microUSB 2.0	microUSB 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, hotspot (v2.2 or higher)	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, DLNA

Features
Browser	HTML	WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (NetFront)
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity, compass	Accelerometer
	ANT+ MP4/H.264/WMV player MP3/eAAC+/WMA/WAV player TrackID music recognition Document viewer Voice memo Predictive text input	Facebook and Twitter apps WMV/RV/MP4/3GP player MP3/WMA/WAV/RA/AAC/M4A player TrackID music recognition TV out (VGA resolution) Organizer Document viewer Voice memo Predictive text input

Battery
Stand-by	Up to 285 h (2G) / Up to 360 h (3G)	Up to 430 h (2G) / Up to 440 h (3G)
Talk time	Up to 4 h (2G) / Up to 3 h 30 min (3G)	Up to 12 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 10 min (3G)
Type	Removable Li-Po 930 mAh battery	Removable Li-Po 1200 mAh battery

Misc
Colors	Black, Red, Pink	Black, White
Price	About 70 EUR	About 150 EUR
SAR EU	1.61 W/kg (head)	1.03 W/kg (head)

Tests
Audio quality	Noise -86.8dB / Crosstalk -83.6dB	Noise -88.0dB / Crosstalk -88.7dB
Camera	Photo	Photo
Loudspeaker	Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB	Voice 69dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 72dB

Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini pro

Compact and pocketable
Physical QWERTY keyboard for easy typing
Relatively durable build quality

Slower processor
Limited performance
Outdated display technology
Basic camera

Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro

Faster processor and GPU
Smoother user experience
Potentially better multimedia capabilities
Slightly improved battery life (estimated)

Larger than the X10 mini pro
Outdated display technology
Basic camera

Display Comparison

Both phones featured relatively small displays for their time, typically around 3.2 inches. The Vivaz Pro's display might have offered slightly better color reproduction due to potential hardware differences, but both were adequate for the era. Resolution was similar, limiting visual fidelity.

Camera Comparison

Both phones were marketed with 'photo' cameras, indicating a focus on still photography. While specific megapixel counts are difficult to confirm definitively without further research, both likely offered similar image quality for their time – adequate for casual snapshots but lacking in detail and low-light performance by modern standards. Video recording capabilities were also present on both.

Performance

The Vivaz Pro's 720 MHz processor and PowerVR SGX GPU provide a noticeable performance advantage over the X10 mini pro's 600 MHz ARM 11 processor. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall user experience. The Snapdragon S1 chipset in the X10 mini pro was competent, but couldn't match the Vivaz Pro's power.

Battery Life

Battery life was a crucial factor in older smartphones. The Vivaz Pro likely had a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering marginally better battery life than the X10 mini pro, but both would require daily charging with moderate usage.

Buying Guide

The Xperia X10 mini pro is ideal for users prioritizing a compact form factor and a physical QWERTY keyboard for efficient typing. The Vivaz Pro is better suited for those who value a smoother user experience and slightly better multimedia capabilities, even with its age.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are these phones still usable today?

While technically usable, these phones are very outdated. They lack modern features, have limited app compatibility, and are vulnerable to security risks. They are best suited for nostalgic purposes or as retro devices.

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?

The Vivaz Pro is the better choice for gaming due to its faster processor and dedicated GPU. However, don't expect a modern gaming experience – the games available for these phones are very limited.