The Sony Ericsson Xperia Ray and Arc were both popular Android phones from a bygone era. While sharing a similar Snapdragon S2 chipset, they offered distinct experiences. This comparison dives deep into their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one is right for you (or a collector!).
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia Arc generally edges out the Ray thanks to its significantly better display contrast. While both offer a similar processor, the Arc's screen makes a noticeable difference in viewing content. Both are relics of the past, but the Arc provides a slightly more enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - ST18i | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - LT15i |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | - |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | - |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - ST18a | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 / 800 - LT15a |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, June. Released 2011, August | 2011, January. Released 2011, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 111 x 53 x 9.4 mm (4.37 x 2.09 x 0.37 in) | 125 x 63 x 8.7 mm (4.92 x 2.48 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 100 g (3.53 oz) | 117 g (4.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~297 ppi density) | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.3 inches, 30.0 cm2 (~51.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.2 inches, 48.6 cm2 (~61.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LED-backlit LCD, | LED-backlit LCD, |
| | Touch sensitive controls | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Scorpion | 1.0 GHz Scorpion |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 | Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 |
| GPU | Adreno 205 | Adreno 205 |
| OS | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread), upgradable to 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread), upgradable to 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 4 GB included | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 8 GB included |
| Internal | 1GB (300MB user available), 512MB RAM | 320MB 512MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (Periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.4, 17mm (ultrawide)
2 MP, (depth) | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | VGA | - |
| | - | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 2.1, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | - |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, DLNA, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | HTML, Adobe Flash |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | ANT+
MP4/H.264 player
MP3/WAV player
TrackID music recognition
SensMe
Document viewer
Voice memo
Predictive text input | ANT+
HDMI port
MP4/H.264/WMV player
MP3/eAAC+/WMA/WAV player
TrackID music recognition
NeoReader barcode scanner
Document viewer
Voice memo/dial/commands
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired
5W reverse wired | - |
| Music play | Up to 36 h | Up to 31 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 430 h (2G) / Up to 440 h (3G) | Up to 430 h (2G) / Up to 400 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h 50 min (2G) / Up to 7 h (3G) | Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 7 h (3G) |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1500 mAh battery | Removable Li-Po 1500 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, White, Pink | Midnight Blue, Misty Silver |
| Models | BMH-AN10, BMH-AN20 | - |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.96 W/kg (head) | 0.66 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -89.4dB / Crosstalk -91.3dB |
Noise -89.4dB / Crosstalk -91.5dB |
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1.955:1 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: 1207:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 64dB / Noise 61dB / Ring 66dB
|
Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 78dB
|
Sony Ericsson Xperia ray
- Slightly more compact design
- Reverse wired charging (5W)
- Poor display contrast
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Outdated performance
Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
- Superior display contrast
- Slightly better battery life
- More immersive viewing experience
- Larger size
- Outdated performance
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
The Xperia Arc boasts a substantially higher contrast ratio (1207:1 nominal) compared to the Ray's 1.955:1 (sunlight). This translates to deeper blacks and more vibrant colors on the Arc, making it significantly better for watching videos and browsing photos. The Ray's display, while adequate, struggles in direct sunlight and lacks the punch of the Arc's screen. Both phones feature a similar resolution, so the contrast is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed, but both phones featured a standard 8MP camera for their time. Image quality will be similar, with decent results in good lighting conditions but struggling in low light. Video recording capabilities were also comparable, offering 720p resolution.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the same Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 chipset and a 1.0 GHz Scorpion CPU. Performance will be comparable, though both will feel sluggish by modern standards. Expect some lag when multitasking or running demanding apps. Gaming will be limited to simpler titles.
Battery Life
The Xperia Arc generally had a larger battery capacity (1500mAh) compared to the Ray (1300mAh). This translates to slightly better battery life on the Arc, though both phones will require daily charging with moderate use. The Ray's reverse wired charging is a minor bonus.
Buying Guide
The Xperia Ray might appeal to collectors seeking a slightly more compact device. The Xperia Arc is a better choice for anyone prioritizing a vibrant display and a more immersive viewing experience, assuming they can tolerate the age of the hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones still worth buying?
They are primarily of interest to collectors or those seeking a nostalgic Android experience. Don't expect modern performance or features.
❓ What operating system do these phones run?
Both phones originally shipped with Android 2.3 (Gingerbread), with potential for updates depending on the region and carrier.