The Sony Ericsson Xperia Active and Neo V were popular choices in their time, offering a blend of features and affordability. But which one truly stood out? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you decide which phone was the better option.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xperia Neo V edges out the Active thanks to its superior battery life and slightly improved design. While both share the same chipset and CPU, the Neo V's endurance and aesthetics give it a slight advantage, making it the preferred choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - MT11i |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | Yes | Class 10 |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | HSDPA 1900 / 2100 / 800 | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - MT11a |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, June. Released 2011, October | 2011, August. Released 2011, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 92 x 55 x 16.5 mm (3.62 x 2.17 x 0.65 in) | 116 x 57 x 13 mm (4.57 x 2.24 x 0.51 in) |
| Keyboard | - | QWERTY |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 110.8 g (3.88 oz) | 126 g (4.44 oz) |
| | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Flashlight | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~192 ppi density) | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~265 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.0 inches, 26.8 cm2 (~53.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.7 inches, 37.7 cm2 (~57.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LED-backlit LCD, | LED-backlit LCD, |
| | Touch sensitive controls | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Scorpion | 1.0 GHz Scorpion |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 | Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 |
| GPU | Adreno 205 | Adreno 205 |
| OS | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread), upgradable to 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) | Android 2.3.4 (Gingerbread), upgradable to 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included |
| Internal | 1GB (320MB user available), 512MB RAM | 1GB (320MB user available), 512MB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes, up to 500 entries | Yes, Photocall |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | VGA |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Alert types | Vibration; Polyphonic, MP3, WAV ringtones | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 2.1, A2DP, EDR |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, DLNA, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | No |
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | No | No |
| Messaging | SMS | SMS, MMS |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | ANT+
MP4/H.264 player
MP3/eAAC+/WAV player
TrackID music recognition
Document viewer
Voice memo
Predictive text input | ANT+
HDMI port
MP4/H.264/WMV player
MP3/WMA/WAV/eAAC+ player
TrackID music recognition
Organizer
Document viewer
Voice memo/dial/commands
Predictive text input (T9 Trace) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 25 h | Up to 31 h |
| Stand-by | Up to 351 h (2G) / Up to 335 h (3G) | Up to 430 h (2G) / Up to 400 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h 53 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 31 min (3G) | Up to 6 h 55 min (2G) / Up to 7 h (3G) |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1200 mAh battery | Removable Li-Po 1500 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Orange/Black, White/Black | White, Blue Gradient, Silver |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -89.5dB / Crosstalk -91.4dB |
Noise -89.6dB / Crosstalk -80.9dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 42h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1578:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 70dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 68dB
|
Voice 68dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 71dB
|
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -89.5dB / Crosstalk -91.4dB | Noise -89.6dB / Crosstalk -80.9dB |
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 42h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1578:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 70dB / Noise 64dB / Ring 68dB | Voice 68dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 71dB |
Sony Ericsson Xperia active
- Rugged and durable design
- Water resistance
- Compact size
- Shorter battery life
- Less impressive camera
- Screen prone to scratches
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
- Longer battery life (42h)
- Slightly better camera quality
- Improved design and aesthetics
- Better viewing angles
- Less rugged than Active
- Performance similar to Active
Display Comparison
Both devices feature similar displays with a nominal contrast ratio of 1578:1. However, the Neo V generally had a slightly better perceived color accuracy and viewing angles due to minor differences in panel technology. The Active's screen was known to be a bit more prone to scratches.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a photo/video camera, but the Neo V's camera often produced slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Active's camera was adequate but lacked the Neo V's subtle improvements in color reproduction and detail.
Performance
Powered by the same Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon S2 chipset and 1.0 GHz Scorpion CPU, performance between the two phones is largely comparable. Expect smooth navigation and app usage for basic tasks, but demanding games might struggle. The Neo V's slightly better software optimization could provide a marginal performance boost.
Battery Life
This is where the Neo V truly shines. Its 1500mAh battery provided an impressive endurance rating of 42 hours, significantly outperforming the Active's smaller battery (typically around 1200mAh) which offered considerably shorter usage times.
Buying Guide
The Xperia Active was targeted towards active users, boasting a rugged design and water resistance. It's a good choice for those prioritizing durability. The Xperia Neo V, on the other hand, appeals to users seeking a better multimedia experience and longer battery life, making it suitable for everyday use and entertainment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Was the Xperia Active truly waterproof?
The Xperia Active was water-repellent, not fully waterproof. It could withstand splashes but shouldn't be submerged for extended periods.
❓ Are spare parts still available for these phones?
Finding genuine spare parts for these older Sony Ericsson models can be challenging. Third-party parts are available, but quality can vary.