Sony Ericsson Vivaz vs Satio (Idou): A 2009 Smartphone Battle

The Sony Ericsson Vivaz and Satio (Idou) were flagship smartphones from 2009, both vying for the title of best camera phone. While both offered impressive features for their time, they took different approaches. This review dives deep into a head-to-head comparison to determine which device ultimately delivered a better experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Satio (Idou) edges out the Vivaz thanks to its significantly faster Cortex-A8 processor and slightly better overall camera capabilities. While the Vivaz had a decent screen, the Satio’s performance and camera features made it the more compelling choice for enthusiasts.

PHONES
Phone Names Sony Ericsson Vivaz Sony Ericsson Satio (Idou)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 2100
SpeedHSPA 10.2/2 MbpsHSPA 7.2/3.6 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPAGSM / HSPA
 HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - Satio(a) for the Americas
Launch
Announced2010, January. Released 2010, March2009, February. Released 2009, October
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions107 x 51.7 x 12.5 mm (4.21 x 2.04 x 0.49 in)112 x 55 x 13 mm (4.41 x 2.17 x 0.51 in)
SIMMini-SIMMini-SIM
Weight97 g (3.42 oz)126 g (4.44 oz)
Display
Resolution360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density)360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~210 ppi density)
Size3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~51.0% screen-to-body ratio)3.5 inches, 33.8 cm2 (~54.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colorsTFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colors
 Handwriting recognition-
Platform
CPU720 MHz, PowerVR SGX GPU600 MHz Cortex-A8
GPU-PowerVR SGX
OSSymbian Series 60, 5th editionSymbian 9.4, Series 60 rel. 5
Memory
Card slotmicroSDHC (dedicated slot), 8 GB includedmicroSDHC (dedicated slot), 8 GB included
Internal75MB128MB; 256MB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashxenon flash, video LED flash
Single8 MP, AF12 MP, AF
Video720p@24fpsw480p@30fps (via SW update)
Selfie camera
Single-VGA videocall camera
 No-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth2.1, A2DP2.0, A2DP
PositioningGPS, A-GPS; Wisepilot navigationGPS, A-GPS
RadioStereo FM radioStereo FM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.02.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g, DLNAWi-Fi 802.11 b/g, DLNA
Features
BrowserWAP 2.0 / xHTML (NetFront)WAP 2.0/HTML, RSS reader
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, proximity
 Facebook and Twitter apps WMV/RV/MP4/3GP player MP3/WMA/WAV/RA/AAC/M4A player TrackID music recognition TV out (VGA resolution) Organizer Document viewer Gesture control Voice memo Predictive text inputGesture control MP4/H.264/WMV player MP3/WAV/WMA/eAAC+ player TV-out Office document viewer Organizer Predictive text input
Battery
Stand-byUp to 430 h (2G) / Up to 440 h (3G)Up to 360 h (2G) / Up to 340 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 13 h (2G) / Up to 5 h 20 min (3G)Up to 11 h (2G) / Up to 4 h 50 min (3G)
TypeRemovable Li-Po 1200 mAh batteryRemovable Li-Po 1000 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsPink, Silver Moon, Cosmic Black, Galaxy Blue, Venus RubyBlack, Silver, Bordeaux
PriceAbout 80 EURAbout 180 EUR
SAR EU1.04 W/kg (head)1.58 W/kg (head)
Tests
Audio quality Noise -86.2dB / Crosstalk -85.7dB Noise -87.0dB / Crosstalk -84.3dB
Camera Photo Photo
Loudspeaker Voice 64dB / Noise 59dB / Ring 69dB Voice 71dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 78dB

Sony Ericsson Vivaz

  • Vibrant Display
  • User-Friendly Interface
  • Decent Camera for its time
  • Good build quality

  • Slower Processor
  • Less Advanced Camera Features
  • Limited App Support compared to later smartphones

Sony Ericsson Satio (Idou)

  • Faster Cortex-A8 Processor
  • Superior Camera with Xenon Flash
  • More Advanced Camera Features
  • Better Performance

  • Potentially Shorter Battery Life
  • More Complex User Interface
  • Finding a working unit can be difficult

Display Comparison

Both phones featured a 3.2-inch display, but the Satio’s display was generally considered to have slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles. The Vivaz’s display was bright and vibrant, but lacked the Satio’s refinement. Resolution was similar, around 360x480 pixels.

Camera Comparison

Both phones boasted impressive camera specs for their time. The Satio (Idou) had a 12.1MP camera with Xenon flash, while the Vivaz had an 8.1MP camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the Satio's larger sensor and Xenon flash generally produced better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Satio also offered more advanced camera features like ISO settings and white balance adjustments.

Performance

This is where the Satio truly shines. Its 600 MHz Cortex-A8 processor was a significant upgrade over the Vivaz's 720 MHz processor (though clock speed isn't everything). The Cortex-A8 architecture offered superior performance and responsiveness, making the Satio noticeably faster for multitasking and demanding applications. The Satio's PowerVR SGX GPU also provided a smoother gaming experience.

Battery Life

The Satio (Idou) had a slightly larger battery (1150 mAh) compared to the Vivaz (1200 mAh). However, the Satio's more powerful processor and features likely resulted in similar or slightly shorter battery life in real-world usage. Both phones offered around 8-10 hours of talk time and 24 hours of standby.

Buying Guide

The Sony Ericsson Vivaz is suitable for users prioritizing a vibrant display and a straightforward user experience. The Sony Ericsson Satio (Idou) is ideal for photography enthusiasts and those who value faster performance and a more feature-rich camera system, assuming they can find one in working condition.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ What operating system did these phones use?
Both the Vivaz and Satio ran Sony Ericsson's proprietary UI Edition 2.0, based on Symbian OS.
❓ Are these phones still worth anything today?
From a practical standpoint, no. They are outdated and lack modern features. However, they may hold some collector's value for enthusiasts of vintage smartphones.