Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro vs Nokia C6: A Head-to-Head Showdown

The Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro and Nokia C6 were popular smartphones of their time, offering distinct features and experiences. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, performance, and overall value to help you understand which device held up better. Let's explore which phone was the better choice for users back then.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro edges out the Nokia C6 thanks to its significantly faster processor and superior GPU. While both offer a basic photo camera, the Vivaz Pro's hardware provides a smoother user experience and potentially better graphics performance. However, Nokia's reputation for reliability and potentially longer software support should be considered.

PHONES
Phone Names	Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro	Nokia C6

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 900 / 2100	HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100
Speed	HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps	HSPA 3.6/0.384 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA	GSM / HSPA
	HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100

Launch
Announced	2010, February. Released 2010, May	2010, April. Released 2010, July
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Dimensions	109 x 52 x 15 mm (4.29 x 2.05 x 0.59 in)	113 x 53 x 16.8 mm, 80 cc (4.45 x 2.09 x 0.66 in)
Keyboard	QWERTY	QWERTY
SIM	Mini-SIM	Mini-SIM
Weight	117 g (4.13 oz)	150 g (5.29 oz)

Display
Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	-
Resolution	360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density)	360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~229 ppi density)
Size	3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~49.8% screen-to-body ratio)	3.2 inches, 28.2 cm2 (~47.1% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	TFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colors	TFT resistive touchscreen, 16M colors
	Handwriting recognition	-

Platform
CPU	720 MHz, PowerVR SGX GPU	434 MHz ARM 11
OS	Symbian Series 60, 5th edition	Symbian 9.4, Series 60 rel. 5

Memory
Card slot	microSDHC (dedicated slot), 8 GB included	microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included
Internal	75MB	240MB

Main Camera
Features	LED flash	LED flash
Single	5 MP, AF	5 MP, AF
Video	720p@24fps	480p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	-	QVGA
	No	-

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	2.1, A2DP	2.0, A2DP
Positioning	GPS, A-GPS; Wisepilot navigation	GPS, A-GPS
Radio	Stereo FM radio, RDS	Stereo FM radio, RDS
USB	microUSB 2.0	microUSB 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, DLNA	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g

Features
Browser	WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (NetFront)	WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite
Sensors	Accelerometer	Accelerometer, proximity
	Facebook and Twitter apps WMV/RV/MP4/3GP player MP3/WMA/WAV/RA/AAC/M4A player TrackID music recognition TV out (VGA resolution) Organizer Document viewer Voice memo Predictive text input	MP3/WMA/WAV/eAAC+ player MP4/H.264/WMV player Document viewer (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF) Voice command/dial Predictive text input

Battery
Music play	-	Up to 30 h
Stand-by	Up to 430 h (2G) / Up to 440 h (3G)	Up to 384 h (2G) / Up to 384 h (3G)
Talk time	Up to 12 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 10 min (3G)	Up to 7 h (2G) / Up to 5 h (3G)
Type	Removable Li-Po 1200 mAh battery	Removable Li-Ion 1200 mAh battery (BL-4J)

Misc
Colors	Black, White	White, Black
Price	About 150 EUR	About 120 EUR
SAR	-	1.20 W/kg (head) 1.21 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	1.03 W/kg (head)	1.05 W/kg (head)

Tests
Audio quality	Noise -88.0dB / Crosstalk -88.7dB	Noise -90.5dB / Crosstalk -90.4dB
Camera	Photo	Photo
Loudspeaker	Voice 69dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 72dB	Voice 68dB / Noise 61dB / Ring 77dB

Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro

Faster Processor (720 MHz)
Dedicated GPU (PowerVR SGX)
Potentially better display quality
More responsive user experience

Potentially shorter battery life
Sony Ericsson brand no longer exists
Limited software updates

Nokia C6

Reputable brand (Nokia)
Potentially longer software support (historically)
Durable build quality (typical of Nokia)
Potentially better battery life

Slower Processor (434 MHz)
No dedicated GPU
Less responsive user experience
Outdated technology

Display Comparison

Both phones featured relatively standard displays for their time – typically around 3.2-3.5 inches with resolutions around 320x480 pixels. The Vivaz Pro might have offered slightly better color reproduction due to Sony's display technology, but the difference would be marginal. Viewing angles and brightness were likely comparable.

Camera Comparison

Both phones were equipped with a basic photo camera, likely around 5-8 megapixels. Image quality would be heavily dependent on lighting conditions and software processing. The Vivaz Pro's more powerful processor *could* allow for slightly faster image processing, but overall camera performance would be similar.

Performance

This is where the Vivaz Pro shines. Its 720 MHz processor and PowerVR SGX GPU provide a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia C6's 434 MHz ARM 11 processor. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and potentially better graphics performance on the Vivaz Pro.

Battery Life

Battery life is difficult to definitively compare without specific battery capacity information. However, the Nokia C6, with its less power-hungry processor, *might* have offered slightly better battery life under moderate usage. The Vivaz Pro's more powerful hardware would likely consume more power.

Buying Guide

The Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro is ideal for users who prioritize speed and responsiveness, especially for basic gaming or media consumption. The Nokia C6 might appeal to those seeking a reliable and durable device with a focus on core smartphone functionality and potentially longer-lasting battery life (though this is speculative given the era).

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone was released first?

The Nokia C6 was released in 2009, while the Sony Ericsson Vivaz Pro followed in 2010.

❓ Are spare parts readily available for these phones?

Finding spare parts for both phones will be challenging due to their age. Availability will depend on online marketplaces and specialized repair shops.