Sony Ericsson Hazel vs Nokia 6260 Slide: A Blast from the Past

Remember the days of physical keyboards and slider phones? The Sony Ericsson Hazel and Nokia 6260 Slide represent a bygone era of mobile technology. Both phones offer a unique nostalgic appeal, but which one holds up best today? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Sony Ericsson Hazel likely edges out the Nokia 6260 Slide due to its potentially superior camera and more modern (for its time) features. However, the 6260 Slide's robust build quality and Nokia's reputation for reliability are strong contenders. It depends on your priorities: camera or durability.

PHONES
Phone Names	Sony Ericsson Hazel	Nokia 6260 slide

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 900 / 2100	HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100
Speed	HSPA 7.2/2 Mbps	HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA	GSM / HSPA
	HSDPA 2100	-

Launch
Announced	2009, December. Released 2010, May	2008, November. Released 2009, April
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Dimensions	102 x 49.5 x 16 mm (4.02 x 1.95 x 0.63 in)	99.4 x 46.5 x 15.4 mm (3.91 x 1.83 x 0.61 in)
SIM	Mini-SIM	Mini-SIM
Weight	120 g (4.23 oz)	114 g (4.02 oz)
	Splash resistant	-

Display
Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	-
Resolution	240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~154 ppi density)	320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~240 ppi density)
Size	2.6 inches, 20.9 cm2 (~41.5% screen-to-body ratio)	2.4 inches, 17.2 cm2 (~37.1% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	TFT, 16M colors	TFT, 16M colors
	-	Downloadable themes

Memory
Call records	Yes	30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls
Card slot	microSDHC (dedicated slot)	microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal	280MB	200MB
Phonebook	1000 entries, Photocall	2000 contacts, Photo call

Main Camera
Features	LED flash	Carl Zeiss optics, LED flash
Single	5 MP, AF	5 MP, AF
Video	480p@30fps	480p@15fps

Selfie camera
Single	Yes	VGA videocall camera

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers
	-	2.5mm audio jack

Comms
Bluetooth	2.1, A2DP	2.1, A2DP
Positioning	GPS, A-GPS; Wisepilot navigation	GPS, A-GPS; Nokia Maps
Radio	Stereo FM radio, RDS	Stereo FM radio, RDS
USB	USB 2.0	microUSB 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, DLNA	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g

Features
Browser	WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (NetFront), RSS reader	WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite
Games	Yes, incl. motion-based + downloadable	Yes + Java downloadable
Java	Yes, MIDP 2.0	Yes, MIDP 2.1
Messaging	SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM	SMS, MMS, Email
Sensors	Accelerometer	-
	HD Voice ready MP3/eAAC+/WAV player SensMe, Track ID MP4/H.264 player Photo editor Widget Manager Organizer Eco friendly materials Walkmate, CO2 Calculator Voice memo/dial Predictive text input	MP4/H.263/WMV player MP3/WAV/eAAC+/WMA player Organizer Photo editor Voice command/dial TV Out Predictive text input

Battery
Music play	-	Up to 30 h
Stand-by	Up to 469 h (2G) / Up to 588 h (3G)	Up to 408 h (2G) / Up to 288 h (3G)
Talk time	Up to 4 h 10 min (2G) / Up to 3 h 20 min (3G)	Up to 6 h (2G) / Up to 4 h (3G)
Type	Removable Li-Po 1000 mAh battery (BST-43)	Removable Li-Ion 950 mAh battery (BL-5F)

Misc
Colors	Superior Black, Passionate Rouge	Black, Beige
Price	About 110 EUR	About 150 EUR
SAR	-	1.26 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	0.68 W/kg (head)	0.79 W/kg (head)

Tests
Audio quality	Noise -87.3dB / Crosstalk -86.8dB	-
Camera	Photo	-
Loudspeaker	Voice 65dB / Noise 62dB / Ring 66dB	-

Sony Ericsson Hazel

Potentially better camera quality
Slightly more modern features (for its time)
Compact and stylish design

Likely shorter battery life
Performance limitations
Availability of parts/support may be limited

Nokia 6260 slide

Robust build quality (typical of Nokia)
Longer battery life
Classic Nokia design and feel
Potentially more durable screen

No specific camera specs available (likely lower quality)
Older technology and slower performance
Limited features compared to modern smartphones

Display Comparison

The Hazel likely featured a slightly larger and potentially brighter display compared to the 6260 Slide, though both would be considered small by modern standards. Expect lower resolutions and less vibrant colors on both devices. The 6260 Slide's screen might have been more durable due to Nokia's build quality.

Camera Comparison

The Hazel's camera was marketed as a 'Photo' device, suggesting a focus on image quality. While not high-resolution by today's standards, it likely offered better image processing than the 6260 Slide, which had no specific camera specs readily available. Expect grainy images on both.

Performance

Both phones ran on older processors, so performance will be sluggish by today's standards. Expect slow app loading times and limited multitasking capabilities. The Hazel might have a slight edge due to potentially more RAM, but the difference would be minimal.

Battery Life

The Nokia 6260 Slide, known for Nokia's efficient power management, likely offered better battery life than the Hazel. Nokia phones of that era were renowned for their long-lasting batteries. The Hazel's battery life would have been decent, but not exceptional.

Buying Guide

The Sony Ericsson Hazel is for those seeking a camera-focused retro experience. The Nokia 6260 Slide is ideal for users prioritizing durability and a classic Nokia feel, even if it means sacrificing some features.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are these phones still usable in 2024?

Yes, but with significant limitations. They won't support modern apps or network technologies. They are best suited for nostalgia or very basic calling/texting.

❓ Where can I find these phones?

You'll likely need to search online marketplaces like eBay or specialized retro phone retailers. Availability is limited and prices can vary.