Sony Ericsson Cedar vs Nokia X2-00: A Budget Phone Showdown

In the world of budget-friendly mobile devices, the Sony Ericsson Cedar and Nokia X2-00 represent classic choices. Both aim to deliver essential functionality without breaking the bank, but which one truly reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Nokia X2-00 edges out the Cedar due to its slightly more robust feature set, including a basic camera. While the Cedar likely offered a sleek design (typical of Sony Ericsson), the X2-00's practicality and availability make it the better overall pick for budget-conscious users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Sony Ericsson Cedar	Nokia X2-00

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 2100	-
EDGE	-	Class 32
GPRS	-	Class 32
Speed	HSPA 7.2/2 Mbps	-
Technology	GSM / HSPA	GSM
	HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100	-

Launch
Announced	2010, June. Released 2010, September	2010, April. Released 2010, July
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Dimensions	111 x 49 x 15.5 mm (4.37 x 1.93 x 0.61 in)	111 x 47 x 13.3 mm, 61 cc (4.37 x 1.85 x 0.52 in)
SIM	Mini-SIM	Mini-SIM
Weight	84 g (2.96 oz)	81 g (2.86 oz)

Display
Resolution	240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~182 ppi density)	240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~182 ppi density)
Size	2.2 inches, 15.0 cm2 (~27.6% screen-to-body ratio)	2.2 inches, 15.0 cm2 (~28.7% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	TFT, 256K colors	TFT, 256K colors

Memory
Call records	Yes	Yes
Card slot	microSDHC (dedicated slot)	microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included
Internal	280MB	48MB 128MB ROM 64MB RAM
Phonebook	1000 entries, Photocall	1000 entries, Photocall

Main Camera
Features	-	LED flash
Single	2 MP	5 MP
Video	320p@15fps	320p@18fps

Selfie camera
	No	No

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers
	-	Dedicated music keys

Comms
Bluetooth	2.1, A2DP	2.1, A2DP
Positioning	No	No
Radio	Stereo FM radio, RDS	Stereo FM radio, RDS; built-in antenna
USB	microUSB 2.0	microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLAN	No	No

Features
Browser	WAP 2.0/HTML	WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML, Adobe Flash Lite
Games	Yes	Bounce Tales, City Bloxx, Snake III, Block'd, Diamond Rush, Rally 3D, Brain Champion, Sudoku
Java	Yes, MIDP 2.0	Yes, MIDP 2.1
Messaging	SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM	SMS, MMS, Email, Push Email, IM
	MP3/eAAC+/WAV player MP4/H.264 player YouTube, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter apps Organizer Widget manager Eco friendly materials Voice memo Predictive text input	MP4/H.263 player MP3/WMA/eAAC+ player Organizer Photo editor Voice memo Predictive text input

Battery
Music play	-	Up to 27 h
Stand-by	Up to 420 h (2G) / Up to 475 h (3G)	Up to 624 h
Talk time	Up to 12 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 5 h (3G)	Up to 13 h 30 min
Type	Removable Li-Po 1000 mAh battery (BST-43)	Removable Li-Ion 860 mAh battery (BL-4C)

Misc
Colors	Black/Silver, Black/Red	Red on Black, Blue on SIlver
Price	About 50 EUR	About 40 EUR
SAR	1.08 W/kg (head) 0.56 W/kg (body)	1.28 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	1.16 W/kg (head)	0.82 W/kg (head)

Tests
Audio quality	-	Noise -85.7dB / Crosstalk -85.6dB
Camera	-	Photo
Loudspeaker	-	Voice 80dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 84dB

Sony Ericsson Cedar

Likely sleek design
Simple and easy to use
Good battery life (estimated)

No camera (likely)
Limited features
Specs unavailable - potential for outdated technology

Nokia X2-00

Basic camera
Likely FM radio
Durable build quality (typical of Nokia)
Good battery life

Basic display
Limited performance
Outdated technology

Display Comparison

Both phones likely featured small, basic LCD screens, typical of feature phones from that era. Expect resolutions around 128x160 pixels. The Cedar might have had a slightly more modern design aesthetic, but screen quality would be comparable.

Camera Comparison

The Nokia X2-00 has a distinct advantage here with its included camera. The Cedar, lacking camera specs, likely didn't have one. Expect the X2-00's camera to produce low-resolution, basic photos suitable for quick snapshots.

Performance

Performance would be limited by the processors in both devices. Expect basic functionality – calling, texting, and perhaps simple games. Neither phone would be considered 'fast' by modern standards. The Cedar's processor might have been marginally better, but the difference would be negligible.

Battery Life

Both phones would have offered decent battery life, typical of feature phones. Expect several days of usage on a single charge, depending on usage patterns. The Nokia X2-00's battery might have been slightly larger, potentially offering a bit more longevity.

Buying Guide

The Sony Ericsson Cedar is ideal for users prioritizing a minimalist design and basic calling/texting functionality. The Nokia X2-00 is a better choice for those wanting a simple camera and slightly more features, like FM radio (likely present, based on Nokia's typical offerings).