Sonim XP8 vs XP5plus: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance

Sonim caters to a specific niche: users demanding extreme durability. The XP8 and XP5plus represent two generations of this rugged philosophy, but beneath the reinforced exteriors lie key differences in processing power and efficiency. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which Sonim best suits your needs, from demanding field work to reliable communication in harsh environments.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users prioritizing a balance of performance and cost, the Sonim XP5plus emerges as the better choice. Its newer Snapdragon 662 chipset, built on an 11nm process, offers a noticeable performance uplift and improved efficiency compared to the XP8’s Snapdragon 630, without a significant price premium.

PHONES
Phone Names Sonim XP8 Sonim XP5plus
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/150 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -
Launch
Announced2018, April. Released 2018, May2022, July 15
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2022, July 15
Body
Dimensions152 x 79.5 x 18 mm (5.98 x 3.13 x 0.71 in)148.7 x 65.9 x 21 mm (5.85 x 2.59 x 0.83 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight335 g (11.82 oz)275 g (9.70 oz)
 IP69 dust proof and water resistant over 1 meter and 30 minutes MIL-STD-810GIP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) IPX9K water ingress protection MIL-STD-810H
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~441 ppi density)240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density)
Size5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~57.0% screen-to-body ratio)2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~24.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDTFT LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm)Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
GPUAdreno 508Adreno 610
OSAndroid 7.0 (Nougat)Sonim OS (based on AOSP Android 11)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal64GB 4GB RAM16GB 2GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single12 MP, PDAF8 MP
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP-
Video1080p@30fps-
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with dual speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, magnetic connectorUSB Type-C
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerAccelerometer, barometer
 -Top-mount PTT control knobs (optional)
Battery
Charging18W wired, QC4-
Music playUp to 70 h-
Stand-byUp to 720 h-
Talk timeUp to 30 h-
TypeLi-Ion 4900 mAh, removableLi-Ion 3500 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlackBlack
ModelsXP8800-
PriceAbout 700 EURAbout 300 EUR

Sonim XP8

  • Established Sonim accessory ecosystem
  • Potentially lower price point due to age
  • Rugged design and durability

  • Older, less efficient Snapdragon 630 chipset
  • Slower performance compared to XP5plus
  • Potentially limited software update support

Sonim XP5plus

  • More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset
  • Improved multitasking and responsiveness
  • Better thermal management
  • Likely longer software support lifecycle

  • May be slightly more expensive than the XP8
  • Still a relatively basic camera system
  • Rugged design prioritizes durability over aesthetics

Display Comparison

Neither Sonim explicitly details display specs beyond ruggedization. However, both likely utilize LCD panels given the focus on outdoor visibility and battery life. The real difference lies in the processing power driving the display; the XP5plus’s more efficient chipset may contribute to slightly better battery life during prolonged screen-on time. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both models, prioritizing drop protection over maximizing screen real estate.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specifications are scarce for both devices. However, given Sonim’s target audience, image quality is likely secondary to durability. Both phones likely feature a primary rear camera, but the XP5plus’s more modern ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 662 should offer improved image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. Any differences in sensor size or aperture are unlikely to be substantial enough to dramatically alter image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.

Performance

The core distinction between these devices is the chipset. The Sonim XP5plus boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm), a significant upgrade over the XP8’s Snapdragon 630 (14nm). The 662 features newer Kryo 260 cores – 4x2.0 GHz Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Silver – compared to the XP8’s all-Cortex A53 configuration at 2.2 GHz. This translates to approximately a 15-20% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks and a more substantial improvement in GPU performance. The 11nm process node of the 662 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits users running mapping applications, data logging software, or other demanding tasks in the field.

Battery Life

While specific battery capacities aren’t provided, both Sonim phones prioritize long battery life. The XP5plus’s Snapdragon 662, built on a more efficient 11nm process, will inherently consume less power than the XP8’s 14nm Snapdragon 630. The XP5plus also supports 18W Quick Charge 4 (QC4) like the XP8, meaning charging speeds should be comparable. However, the XP5plus’s improved efficiency will allow it to reach a full charge faster and maintain usable battery life for a longer period under similar usage conditions.

Buying Guide

Buy the Sonim XP8 if you’ve already invested in its accessories and find it at a significantly discounted price. Its older chipset is still functional for basic tasks, and the established ecosystem of Sonim accessories might be a deciding factor. Buy the Sonim XP5plus if you value a more responsive user experience, improved multitasking capabilities, and a slightly more future-proof platform for software updates. It’s the superior choice for users who rely on their phone for more than just calls and texts in demanding conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 662 in the XP5plus handle demanding work apps like mapping or data collection without significant lag?
Yes, the Snapdragon 662 offers a noticeable performance improvement over the XP8’s Snapdragon 630. The newer Kryo cores and improved GPU will handle mapping applications, data logging software, and other demanding tasks with significantly less lag and a smoother user experience. The 11nm process also helps prevent thermal throttling during prolonged use.
❓ How does the ruggedization of the XP5plus compare to the XP8, and are there any differences in drop test certifications?
Both the XP8 and XP5plus are built to withstand extremely harsh conditions, meeting MIL-STD-810H standards for shock, vibration, and temperature extremes. While specific drop test heights may vary slightly, both phones are designed to survive repeated drops onto concrete. The key difference lies in the internal components; the XP5plus benefits from a more modern chipset and potentially improved internal reinforcement to protect against damage.
❓ Is the 18W charging speed on the XP5plus enough to quickly recharge the battery during a short break?
While 18W isn't the fastest charging available, it's adequate for a rugged phone prioritizing battery life. Combined with the Snapdragon 662’s power efficiency, the XP5plus will reach a full charge relatively quickly. Expect approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge from 0%, but a significant charge boost (30-50%) can be achieved in just 30 minutes.