Sonim XP8 vs. Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G: A Clash of Priorities
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed, connectivity, and a vibrant display, the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset and 30W charging offer a significantly smoother and more convenient experience. However, if your work demands a virtually indestructible phone, the Sonim XP8 remains the only viable choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sonim XP8 | Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 40, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, April. Released 2018, May | 2019, December. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152 x 79.5 x 18 mm (5.98 x 3.13 x 0.71 in) | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 335 g (11.82 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| IP69 dust proof and water resistant over 1 meter and 30 minutes MIL-STD-810G | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~441 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~57.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 508 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Single | 12 MP, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Music play | Up to 70 h | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 720 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 30 h | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 4900 mAh, removable | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White, Starry Night, Sunrise, Classic Blue |
| Models | XP8800 | PCRM00, PCRT00, CPH2009 |
| Price | About 700 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.82 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sonim XP8
- Unmatched durability and ruggedness
- Designed for harsh environments
- Dedicated PTT (Push-to-Talk) functionality (likely)
- Outdated Snapdragon 630 chipset
- Likely inferior display quality
- Slower charging speeds
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Snapdragon 765G offers superior performance
- 30W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Less durable construction
- More susceptible to damage from drops
- May lack specialized features like PTT
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G boasts a significantly more advanced display, achieving a measured peak brightness of 819 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a weakness inherent in the Sonim XP8’s likely more utilitarian panel. While the Sonim’s display specs are unavailable, its focus on ruggedization likely means compromises in color accuracy and brightness. The Oppo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a modern AMOLED or similar technology, offering deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience compared to the Sonim’s probable LCD.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are sparse for the Sonim XP8. The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 765G, offering improved image processing and low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Sonim, it’s difficult to assess its camera quality, but it’s reasonable to assume it prioritizes functionality over photographic excellence. The Oppo’s camera system is likely geared towards social media sharing and everyday photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 765G, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Sonim XP8’s Snapdragon 630 (14nm). The 765G’s Kryo 475 CPU architecture – with its Prime, Gold, and Silver cores – provides a more efficient and responsive experience, particularly in multitasking and demanding applications. The 7nm process also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained loads. While the Sonim’s Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 is adequate for basic tasks, it will struggle with modern games and resource-intensive apps.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Sonim’s unknown battery capacity. However, the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G’s 30W wired charging with a 50% charge in 20 minutes provides a significant convenience advantage over the Sonim XP8’s slower 18W QC4 charging. This faster charging mitigates any potential battery life differences, allowing Oppo users to quickly top up their device when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sonim XP8 if you need a phone that can withstand drops, extreme temperatures, and harsh conditions – ideal for construction, field work, or anyone prone to accidents. Buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity, a bright and responsive display, faster charging, and a more refined software experience for everyday use and entertainment.