The smartphone market is overflowing with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two compelling contenders against each other: the Sharp Aquos zero6 and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both offer a blend of features and value, but which one comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner. Its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, blazing-fast 67W charging, and impressive display brightness outweigh the Aquos zero6's strengths. While the Aquos offers a unique design, the Poco F5 delivers superior performance and value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78, 257 SA/NSA/mmWave | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 14. Released 2021, October 14 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 73 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 146 g (5.15 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), AF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
TOF 3D (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 12.6 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4010 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Swan Black | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | - | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 400 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Sharp Aquos zero6
- Sleek, minimalist design
- Potentially refined software experience
- Compact size (likely)
- Less powerful chipset
- Uncertain software update support
- Limited availability
- Less bright display
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Exceptional performance (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent battery life
- Great value for money
- Potentially less premium build quality
- Xiaomi's MIUI software (can be polarizing)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significant advantage with its 963 nits max brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Aquos zero6 has a good display, details on its brightness are scarce. The Poco F5's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Poco F5 likely uses an AMOLED panel, while the Aquos zero6 is likely LCD, further contributing to the Poco's display superiority.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. However, given the Poco F5's more modern chipset and likely improved image processing, it's expected to deliver better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Aquos zero6's camera is likely adequate, but not a standout feature.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a powerhouse, outperforming the Aquos zero6's Snapdragon 750G by a considerable margin. The Cortex-X2 core in the Poco F5's CPU provides a significant boost in single-core performance, making it noticeably faster for demanding tasks and gaming. The Aquos zero6 is still capable, but the Poco F5 offers a smoother, more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines with its exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118h and active use score of 11:52h. Its 67W wired charging is incredibly fast, fully charging the phone in just 46 minutes. The Aquos zero6's battery performance is less clear, but it's unlikely to match the Poco F5's longevity or charging speed.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Sharp Aquos zero6? Users prioritizing a sleek, minimalist design and a potentially more refined software experience (though Sharp's software support can be a concern) might consider it. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Those seeking exceptional performance, fast charging, and a vibrant display at an aggressive price point will find the Poco F5 hard to resist.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos zero6 worth buying if I prioritize design?
If design is your absolute top priority and you don't mind potentially sacrificing performance and software support, the Aquos zero6's minimalist aesthetic might appeal to you.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset and faster refresh rate display (likely 120Hz).
