The mid-range 5G smartphone market is heating up, and the Sharp Aquos zero6 and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G are two compelling contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity and a solid feature set, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G edges out the Aquos zero6 thanks to its faster charging, potentially brighter display, and generally more competitive pricing. While the Aquos zero6 boasts a sleek design and potentially better software experience, the Mi 10T Lite offers more bang for your buck.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78, 257 SA/NSA/mmWave | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 14. Released 2021, October 14 | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 73 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 146 g (5.15 oz) | 214.5 g (7.58 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | 64GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.1
128GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), AF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 12.6 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4010 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Swan Black | Atlantic Blue, Pearl Gray, Rose Gold Beach |
| Models | - | M2007J17G |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 116h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1368:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318882 (v8)
GeekBench: 2009 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos zero6
- Sleek and minimalist design
- Clean and optimized software
- Accurate color reproduction on display
- Premium build quality (potentially)
- Less widely available
- Slower charging speeds
- Camera specs less publicized
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
- Excellent battery life
- Fast 33W wired charging
- Potentially brighter display
- Competitive pricing
- 120Hz refresh rate
- MIUI software can be polarizing
- Design less premium than Aquos zero6
- Camera performance can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch FHD+ display. The Mi 10T Lite 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 596 nits and a 1368:1 contrast ratio, suggesting potentially better outdoor visibility and vibrant colors. The Aquos zero6's display is known for its accurate color reproduction, but specific brightness figures are harder to find. The Mi 10T Lite also has a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
The Mi 10T Lite 5G typically features a 64MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The Aquos zero6's camera setup is generally considered good, but specific megapixel counts and lens configurations are less widely publicized. Image quality will depend on software processing and overall camera tuning, which can vary significantly.
Performance
Both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset, ensuring comparable performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, software optimization can play a significant role. The Aquos zero6's software is often praised for its fluidity and minimal bloatware, potentially offering a slightly smoother experience. The Mi 10T Lite 5G might have slightly more RAM configurations available.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 116 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Aquos zero6's battery life is respectable, but not as widely documented. The Mi 10T Lite 5G also supports 33W wired charging, significantly faster than the Aquos zero6's charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos zero6 is ideal for users prioritizing a minimalist design, a clean software experience, and potentially a more premium feel. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G is a better choice for those seeking a balance of features, performance, and affordability, especially if fast charging is a priority.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G generally offers better battery life, with an endurance rating of 116 hours. The Aquos zero6's battery life is good, but less extensively documented.
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos zero6 worth the extra cost?
It depends on your priorities. If you value a minimalist design, clean software, and a potentially more premium feel, the Aquos zero6 might be worth the extra cost. However, the Mi 10T Lite 5G offers more features and better value for money.
