The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we pit the sleek and understated Sharp Aquos zero6 against the powerhouse Xiaomi 13 Ultra. This comparison will break down their key features to help you decide which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful processor, superior camera system, and blazing-fast charging. While the Aquos zero6 offers a clean software experience and a compact design, it can't compete with the Ultra's overall performance and features. It's a premium flagship versus a mid-range contender.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78, 257 SA/NSA/mmWave | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 14. Released 2021, October 14 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, April 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 73 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 74.6 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 146 g (5.15 oz) | 227 g (8.01 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 4.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 or f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 3.2x optical zoom
50 MP, f/3.0, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF
TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), AF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12.6 MP | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 35 min
50W wireless, 100% in 49 min
10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4010 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Swan Black | Black, Olive Green, White, Orange, Yellow, Blue |
| Models | - | 2304FPN6DC, 2304FPN6DG |
| Price | About 400 EUR | € 797.98 / $ 389.69 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Sharp Aquos zero6
- Clean Android experience
- Compact and lightweight design
- Good OLED display
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful processor
- Mediocre camera
- Limited availability
- Lower brightness display
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
- Exceptional camera system
- Blazing-fast performance
- Long battery life
- Ultra-fast charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Large and heavy design
- Potentially complex MIUI software
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra's display shines with a measured peak brightness of 1207 nits, offering exceptional visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Aquos zero6 has a good quality OLED display, details on its brightness are scarce, but it's likely less vibrant and visible outdoors compared to the Ultra. The Ultra's larger size also provides more screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra's camera system is a major selling point, featuring a versatile array of lenses and advanced image processing capabilities. It excels in both photo and video quality, offering exceptional detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The Aquos zero6's camera is decent but lacks the Ultra's advanced features and overall image quality.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Xiaomi 13 Ultra obliterates the Snapdragon 750G in the Aquos zero6. The Ultra delivers significantly faster processing speeds, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The zero6 is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra demonstrates impressive battery life with an active use score of 10:09h and an endurance rating of 108h. Its 90W wired and 50W wireless charging capabilities are incredibly fast. The Aquos zero6's battery performance is respectable, but falls short of the Ultra's longevity and charging speed.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos zero6 is ideal for users who prioritize a clean Android experience, a compact form factor, and don't demand top-tier performance. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is for photography enthusiasts, power users, and those who want the absolute best Android has to offer, regardless of price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos zero6 worth buying in 2024?
It depends. If you prioritize a clean Android experience and a compact phone, it can still be a decent option. However, for most users, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra offers significantly better value.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Xiaomi generally provides good software updates, though MIUI can be polarizing. Sharp's update support can be less consistent, so the Xiaomi 13 Ultra is likely to receive updates for a longer period.
