The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Sharp Aquos zero6 and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity and a compelling feature set, but cater to slightly different audiences. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G edges out the Aquos zero6 due to its more established brand recognition, wider availability, and slightly more versatile camera system. However, the Aquos zero6 boasts a cleaner software experience and a potentially more premium feel, making it a strong alternative for those seeking a less cluttered Android experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78, 257 SA/NSA/mmWave | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 14. Released 2021, October 14 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158 x 73 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 146 g (5.15 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), AF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide)
TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 12.6 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4010 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Swan Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A526B, SM-A526B/DS, SM-A5260, SM-A526W, SM-A526U, SM-A526U1 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 137.39 / £ 280.00 / € 115.49 |
| SAR | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 111h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 334981 (v8), 386474 (v9)
GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos zero6
- Clean Android experience
- Minimalist design
- Vibrant display
- Potentially premium build quality
- Limited availability
- Less versatile camera
- Slower charging
- Smaller software support community
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Excellent battery life
- Versatile camera system
- Fast charging (25W)
- Wide availability
- Strong software support
- One UI can feel bloated
- Marketing claims of 'Infinite' contrast ratio
- Design less distinctive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.4-inch display, but the A52 5G's 787 nits max brightness gives it an advantage in outdoor visibility. The Aquos zero6 is known for its vibrant colors and accurate color reproduction, while the A52 5G's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely marketing) suggests deep blacks. The A52 5G also typically has a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G generally has a more versatile camera system, often including a dedicated ultrawide lens and macro lens. While the Aquos zero6's camera is capable, it typically lacks the breadth of features found on the A52 5G. Image processing is also a key differentiator, with Samsung's algorithms often producing more saturated and vibrant images.
Performance
Both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset, meaning performance will be largely similar in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, software optimization can play a significant role. The Aquos zero6's lighter Android skin might offer a slightly snappier feel, while the A52 5G's One UI provides more features and customization options.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A52 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 111 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Aquos zero6's battery life is generally good, but not quite as exceptional as the A52 5G. The A52 5G also supports 25W fast charging, allowing for a 50% charge in just 30 minutes, a feature often missing on the Aquos zero6.
Buying Guide
The Sharp Aquos zero6 is ideal for users who prioritize a clean, bloatware-free Android experience and appreciate a minimalist design. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a better choice for those who want a reliable, feature-rich phone with a strong camera and a wider range of accessories and support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Sharp Aquos zero6 worth buying if I value a clean Android experience?
Yes, the Aquos zero6 is an excellent choice if you prioritize a bloatware-free Android experience and appreciate a minimalist design. However, be aware of its limited availability and smaller software support community.
❓ Which phone has better camera capabilities?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G generally offers better camera capabilities due to its more versatile lens setup and more advanced image processing algorithms.
