Google Pixel 6a vs. Sharp Aquos zero6: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chip delivers significantly better performance, and its camera capabilities are in a different league. While the Aquos zero6 offers a lighter build, the performance trade-offs aren't worth it for the average user.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos zero6 | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 78, 257 SA/NSA/mmWave | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 14. Released 2021, October 14 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158 x 73 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 146 g (5.15 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), AF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12.6 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 4010 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Swan Black | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Sharp Aquos zero6
- Superior performance with Google Tensor chip
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Faster charging with PD3.0 support
- Slightly heavier than the Aquos zero6
- May experience some software bugs (common with new Pixel releases)
Google Pixel 6a
- Lightweight and compact design
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery life (94h endurance)
- Significantly weaker performance compared to Pixel 6a
- Inferior camera quality
- Charging specifications unknown
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a measured peak brightness of 876 nits, providing excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Aquos zero6’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Pixel 6a’s display also benefits from an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rates are likely fixed, impacting smoothness compared to higher-end phones. The Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and contrast make it the clear winner for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system, powered by Google’s computational photography expertise, is a major advantage. While specific sensor details aren’t provided for either phone, the Pixel 6a’s image processing algorithms consistently deliver exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Aquos zero6 likely relies more heavily on hardware, and without details on sensor size or OIS, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. The Pixel 6a’s software-driven approach to image processing provides a more consistent and reliable experience, making it the preferred choice for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Aquos zero6’s Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G (8nm). The Tensor’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, provides substantially more processing power than the Snapdragon 750G’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the Pixel 6a. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during demanding tasks. While the Aquos zero6 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Pixel 6a is the clear choice for power users and gamers.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing internal capacities (not specified for the Aquos zero6). However, the Pixel 6a supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0, offering faster and more efficient charging compared to the Aquos zero6’s charging capabilities (not specified). While both phones will likely last a full day on a single charge, the Pixel 6a’s faster charging provides more convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos zero6 if you prioritize an exceptionally lightweight phone and are willing to compromise on processing power and camera quality. It’s ideal for users who primarily need basic smartphone functionality and value portability above all else. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you demand strong performance, a class-leading camera experience, and guaranteed software updates. This phone is perfect for photography enthusiasts, gamers, and anyone who wants a smooth, responsive user experience.