The Sharp Aquos Zero 2, while an older flagship, presents a compelling alternative to newer mid-range devices like the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. This comparison dissects the trade-offs between a slightly older, more refined flagship experience and a newer, aggressively priced gaming-focused phone, focusing on chipset performance, battery life, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro emerges as the better buy. Its Snapdragon 860 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Aquos Zero 2’s Snapdragon 855, coupled with significantly faster 33W charging. While the Aquos Zero 2 may appeal to those prioritizing a potentially more compact form factor (data unavailable), the X3 Pro delivers superior performance per dollar.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 41 - Taiwan | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 22. Released 2020, May 22 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 141 g (4.97 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
20 MP, f/2.4, 125˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD2.0 | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3130 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | SH-Z20, SHV47, 906SH | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 670 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos Zero 2
- Potentially more compact design (unconfirmed)
- Flagship build quality (assumed)
- PD2.0 charging compatibility
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 855)
- Slower charging speeds
- Limited information on display specs
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 860 processor
- 33W fast charging
- Aggressive price point
- Potentially larger form factor
- Camera likely optimized for social media
- Build quality may not match a flagship
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar display quality in terms of black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type are missing for the Aquos Zero 2. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not exceptional, is a known quantity, offering a solid viewing experience. Without further data on the Aquos Zero 2, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X3 Pro’s readily available specifications provide more confidence.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. The absence of this data makes a direct comparison impossible. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s positioning as a gaming phone, it’s likely the camera system is optimized for social media sharing rather than professional photography. The Aquos Zero 2, as a former flagship, *might* have a more sophisticated camera system, but this remains speculative without further information. We can assume neither phone will excel in low-light conditions without OIS data.
Performance
The Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 represents a generational upgrade over the Aquos Zero 2’s Snapdragon 855. While both are 7nm chips, the 860 features a slightly higher clocked Kryo 485 Gold core (2.96 GHz vs 2.84 GHz) and optimizations for sustained performance. This translates to a tangible advantage in gaming and demanding applications. The Aquos Zero 2’s CPU configuration, with its mix of Kryo 485 cores, is capable, but the 860’s architecture is more efficient and delivers higher peak performance. The X3 Pro is the clear winner for users prioritizing raw processing power.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W charging capability is a significant advantage. It can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, while the Aquos Zero 2 relies on slower PD2.0 charging. This faster charging speed dramatically improves the user experience, especially for gamers and power users. The X3 Pro’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential battery life differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos Zero 2 if you prioritize a potentially more compact design (assuming it's smaller than the X3 Pro, which is not confirmed in the data) and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, faster charging, and a more modern feature set, all at a significantly lower price point. The X3 Pro is the clear choice for users who demand responsiveness and quick power-ups.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 855 in the Aquos Zero 2 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 855 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings and less thermal throttling.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Poco X3 Pro compared to the Aquos Zero 2?
The Poco X3 Pro’s 33W charging is substantially faster. It can reach 100% charge in approximately 59 minutes, while the Aquos Zero 2’s PD2.0 charging will take considerably longer, potentially exceeding 2 hours depending on the charger used.
❓ Is the Poco X3 Pro likely to overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its improved thermal management compared to the 855. While some throttling is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the X3 Pro is generally well-equipped to handle demanding titles without significant performance drops.
