Sharp Aquos Zero 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy S10+: A Detailed Comparison of Two Flagship Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a balance of performance and longevity, the Samsung Galaxy S10+ emerges as the more practical choice. While the Aquos Zero 2 boasts a more efficient Snapdragon 855, the S10+'s wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, and superior display contrast ratio offer a more complete user experience, especially at its current price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Sharp Aquos Zero 2 | Samsung Galaxy S10+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 41 - Taiwan | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 22. Released 2020, May 22 | 2019, February 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2019, March 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back, ceramic frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 157.6 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.20 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 141 g (4.97 oz) | 175 g / 198 g (ceramic) (6.17 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1440 x 3040 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 103.8 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 240Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision | Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA/LATAMOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Exynos 9820 (8 nm) - EMEA/LATAMQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/China |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA/LATAMAdreno 640 - USA/China |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 20 MP, f/2.4, 125˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, AF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@60fps (no EIS), 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 10 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm, depth sensor |
| Features | HDR | Dual video call, Auto-HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (USA & Canada only) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD2.0 | 15W wired, PD2.0 15W wireless (Qi/PMA) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3130 mAh | Li-Ion 4100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink, Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Cardinal Red, Smoke Blue |
| Models | SH-Z20, SHV47, 906SH | SM-G975F, SM-G975U, SM-G975W, SM-G975U1, SM-G9750, SM-G975N, SM-G975X |
| Price | About 670 EUR | $ 199.00 / C$ 879.99 / £ 999.00 / € 299.00 / ₹ 39,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -94.3dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.514 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 333736 (v7), 399901 (v8) GeekBench: 10387 (v4.4), 2190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Sharp Aquos Zero 2
- Potentially better power efficiency with Snapdragon 855 (7nm)
- Clean Android experience (likely)
- PD2.0 fast charging
- Limited information on display quality
- Potentially limited software support
- Lacks wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S10+
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Superior display contrast ratio and brightness
- Versatile camera system
- Exynos 9820 (EMEA/LATAM) may throttle more than Snapdragon 855
- Slightly lower power efficiency (Exynos variant)
- Older device, potentially reduced long-term software support
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S10+ boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal 4.514 in sunlight), suggesting deeper blacks and more vibrant colors compared to the Aquos Zero 2, which lacks specific contrast ratio data. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology, the S10+'s higher contrast ratio translates to a more visually immersive experience, particularly in bright environments. The S10+'s display is also likely to have a higher peak brightness, further enhancing outdoor visibility. The Aquos Zero 2's display specs are less detailed, making a direct comparison challenging, but the S10+ clearly has the edge in display quality based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are missing for both devices, but we can infer some differences. The Galaxy S10+ likely features a more versatile camera system with multiple lenses and advanced image processing algorithms. Samsung's history suggests a focus on vibrant, saturated colors, while Sharp typically aims for more natural color reproduction. The S10+'s camera likely benefits from features like Scene Optimizer and dedicated night mode. Without specific sensor size and aperture data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the S10+'s broader feature set and established camera reputation give it an advantage.
Performance
Both the Aquos Zero 2 and the USA/China variant of the Galaxy S10+ utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm). However, the EMEA/LATAM S10+ features the Exynos 9820 (8nm). The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 855 generally offers better power efficiency than the 8nm Exynos 9820, potentially leading to longer battery life and less thermal throttling in the Aquos Zero 2. Both CPUs feature octa-core architectures, but the Exynos utilizes Samsung's Mongoose M4 cores alongside Cortex-A75 and A55, while the Snapdragon employs Kryo 485 cores. Real-world performance differences are likely subtle for most tasks, but the Snapdragon 855 in the Aquos Zero 2 may exhibit slightly better sustained performance under heavy load due to its superior thermal efficiency.
Battery Life
The Galaxy S10+ achieves an impressive endurance rating of 91 hours, suggesting excellent battery life despite its 15W wired charging and the addition of 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless charging capabilities. The Aquos Zero 2's battery capacity is unknown, but its Snapdragon 855 chipset and potentially optimized software could contribute to comparable or even slightly better battery life. However, the S10+'s wireless charging options provide added convenience, and the reverse wireless charging allows it to top up accessories. The S10+ supports PD2.0, matching the Aquos Zero 2's charging standard, but the S10+'s wireless charging is a significant differentiator.
Buying Guide
Buy the Sharp Aquos Zero 2 if you prioritize battery efficiency and a clean Android experience, and are comfortable with a device that may have limited software support. It's ideal for users who value long-lasting power over extensive features. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S10+ if you prefer a feature-rich flagship with wireless charging, a vibrant display, and a more established ecosystem, even if it means slightly less battery endurance. It's perfect for users who want a versatile smartphone with a strong camera system.